From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E00C7618A for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231138AbjCTNYm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:24:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52604 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231680AbjCTNYm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:24:42 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C92081554C for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDB5B80D5B for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B681FC433D2; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:24:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1679318678; bh=yFLYV6SFXFL66IRK4j40d/JTg7URb2DST9yF5agBjjE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Lg5gqpoldgluHGiwfn6udLGH0M2jBtUigDQB12N1TxVGAvFvTpEnHWVVUlY3M7iTm iCea7cFBt3ePBsgywJvvP9vqKeJTyCOLGlJkHdLblHRrZfrmt09P7dtvsuyY6P59hX 9G2kYep9gPDmstJekjuPQNFo2TRpUO5Ow2hyJaVo= Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:24:35 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Tom Saeger Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , Kees Cook , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 084/357] treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD() Message-ID: References: <20230310133733.973883071@linuxfoundation.org> <20230310133737.692796889@linuxfoundation.org> <20230317182806.owvwdor6qpzp6tve@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230317182806.owvwdor6qpzp6tve@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:28:06PM -0600, Tom Saeger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:36:13PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Kees Cook > > > > [ Upstream commit b13fecb1c3a603c4b8e99b306fecf4f668c11b32 ] > > > > This converts all the existing DECLARE_TASKLET() (and ...DISABLED) > > macros with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD() in preparation for refactoring the > > tasklet callback type. All existing DECLARE_TASKLET() users had a "0" > > data argument, it has been removed here as well. > > > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > Stable-dep-of: 1fdeb8b9f29d ("wifi: iwl3945: Add missing check for create_singlethread_workqueue") > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > > --- > > I noticed kernelci.org bot (5.4) reports: > > Build Failures Detected: > > mips: > ip27_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL > ip28_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL > lasat_defconfig: (gcc-10) FAIL > > Errors summary: > > 1 arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:20: error: ‘pvc_display_tasklet’ undeclared (first use in this function) > 1 arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘&’ token > 1 arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: ‘pvc_display’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/64041dda.170a0220.8cc25.79c9@mx.google.com/ > > Here's what I found... > this backport to 5.4.y of: > b13fecb1c3a6 ("treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD()") > changed all locations of DECLARE_TASKLET with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD, > except one, in arch/mips/lasat/pcivue_proc.c. > > This is due to: > 10760dde9be3 ("MIPS: Remove support for LASAT") preceeding > b13fecb1c3a6 ("treewide: Replace DECLARE_TASKLET() with DECLARE_TASKLET_OLD()") > upstream and the former not being present in 5.4.y. > > I rolled a revert/re-apply with fixes in the attached mbox, > however maybe just a revert makes more sense? Up to you. > > I have yet to try building this on mips, just did this by inspection. I've taken your patches, let's see how that works... thanks! greg k-h