From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994E8C7EE21 for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 09:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230322AbjEDJpX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2023 05:45:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59516 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229972AbjEDJpW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2023 05:45:22 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1975B46B0 for ; Thu, 4 May 2023 02:45:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1683193522; x=1714729522; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xXxKdtNC5aGnqQZK70eazDiZwZew3BpBgKA0azwk6Ig=; b=fXKThyVzgs1agv123vNGJ5hw1cJ0s+8iUTf2tyCAPbZxlOeGX2sME+hP kC/R729sSC8akX36PfcpqsWubNj6HKC7Q4oUqH2H6bCG9EILsfR3aWTt2 y8GBYIEWabRSe1IUI+DmaF+WgrvMccr6KDyYdyeIkiEMHDyEx9YOpammS R5RYxgMZlDYKUfe/SnwtoPFJZAIdqex6q36bE3u0oYgyS5hh1CUy7Vo14 ryo6cD7tXWv28qt2OnMh+TM7axOvUYjopzOnkOHyUs2Py+1nJOUdiFbnU RDGfL40BfL2eWtBIXJfIVC2z1Mr5bUPAzc9pICclFIGJ0X0J/D+Adzqrf g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10699"; a="348929914" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,249,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="348929914" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 May 2023 02:45:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10699"; a="841074862" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,249,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="841074862" Received: from dmitriyp-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO intel.com) ([10.249.37.93]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 May 2023 02:45:18 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 11:45:15 +0200 From: Andi Shyti To: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Andi Shyti , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Maciej Patelczyk , Andi Shyti , Matthew Auld , Andrzej Hajda , Rodrigo Vivi , Chris Wilson , Nirmoy Das Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/i915/gt: Make sure that errors are propagated through request chains Message-ID: References: <20230412113308.812468-1-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> <20230412113308.812468-6-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com> <5b7f82db-b9dd-e9c9-496c-72995469d699@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5b7f82db-b9dd-e9c9-496c-72995469d699@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Tvrtko, > Another option - maybe - is this related to revert of fence error > propagation? If it is and having that would avoid the need for this invasive > fix, maybe we unrevert 3761baae908a7b5012be08d70fa553cc2eb82305 with edits > to limit to special contexts? If doable.. I think that is not enough as we want to get anyway to the last request and fence submitted. Right? I guess this commit should be reverted anyway. Andi