From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28050C7EE22 for ; Wed, 10 May 2023 08:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236704AbjEJIra (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 May 2023 04:47:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236008AbjEJIra (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 May 2023 04:47:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7C4E69; Wed, 10 May 2023 01:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f195b164c4so45519445e9.1; Wed, 10 May 2023 01:47:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683708447; x=1686300447; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LhnW+JP05p5xI3BHymPhzEKMUYpUnBRttHR9ooutHcA=; b=sQji7RQpC1tFjw8pY/rXACVFK44Wpz6QpwTSd5NEk2ENdzXVBrzKDiTYt0kVPnwrWb bcViRDJcJ4qH7fS1W2LVoojw6+ro/2ragXR43AQV+KAjy+jXoLBtF+9df1TFP9+upcTa QDHtFTLJZu/dv4bA4epHAJC7xUyqdvqyiBs+cY+fuYOJ6TDDQ9hJAjROUExK1XUpo5J2 pe9883TDGNNdRcuJRgGdcSD0SlDUcb8LI/UIOz4dYIFbmog9eqHAh5cWaB1wXdbZ3kue MuCBmwNeJ0kn3ArqCQtq325239DDnfnKjjahkL1Z+Un2jtobd9oPPClUOZd1bxxRc/3s xNlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683708447; x=1686300447; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=LhnW+JP05p5xI3BHymPhzEKMUYpUnBRttHR9ooutHcA=; b=P8Qoxl9derE3BdcpLUjMwVP2B89S7OHd1LDp4SHdrcdDFjRvjTJJbldY6IsSUBmiPP fAuDeB6P/7u7FgwGkXXf9YKbbclcKNj0s4YkTE6EjXSfRFNv/Wohw9j9Iw+stO5BsgZC O/iR2yL1fT9OKA7TBqjt+QpifJYelJeXcGbL85WI5H76/y2QyzGEQwki69qvEXRmcnAS c3ngp3zJBR3Rp9GtZfXtA2Z75upv6LqJTsrtAfSPTRFQG9kvPIzg3yN35Q5afh3+LJ2m GjgmZgykzbSbMF/JJqtUuhUCi6a5ynWBguSwhCijluQFOF+zBoZ4NeBk/60RvTDGPlEM rbmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDx1vvQQO8b2HJ01Oe1UOghdnhPlkyOcNoNQdKNOWnjwLzdZ/QNj qbNpVdhB9OsdsOU0o8Ldv0Bn0MwNWXU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4FEGxEnQqg2x4qqKQD9yQXQATLp3B/BWp+Z3oK5uLblyLkRX248AOauwQqT+WxGDEplj8xyQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c8c6:0:b0:3f4:2220:28d5 with SMTP id f6-20020a7bc8c6000000b003f4222028d5mr7786003wml.29.1683708447218; Wed, 10 May 2023 01:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2-20020a05600c294200b003f17eded97bsm22087861wmd.19.2023.05.10.01.47.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 May 2023 01:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 09:47:25 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/610] 6.1.28-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20230509030653.039732630@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230509030653.039732630@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:26:31AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.28 release. > There are 610 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 11 May 2023 03:05:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230501): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3490 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3491 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip