From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E50C77B75 for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 09:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231490AbjEPJUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 05:20:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56972 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232124AbjEPJTs (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 05:19:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240B12D4A; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f475366522so45196635e9.1; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:19:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684228752; x=1686820752; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=y3MkdtHJ2Wn6h9YsBmYWmD4vsSF6yvzo+NF5U8NDuFA=; b=hFh/MCjLptpQwDMiF7H3IKYj9HR6c/PLjm63ECA5NSQN6FEIN8BL4ZOUSNRDwZekBA bs7Uyrpc1YT8AD74aMHC5fWvW3rdPBaK5gifHRuktsAcpSvmZnxKIREl/6y22XbB3eRe S0mz20yLu/ayAMLVszs6jFC5mCPnVp8bhmVkCZhVx7XTVNqScWDWSoPflEXChscKwRZr 7YTqOYSJ+cUKWnN0ew8SpyHoejAgkEVeVQ7wBNux8XCNwcl/LoPY5wK/KBNvFW0WsO1m s6XUtWQMESkI8UBQT6oRX0ax7D/SfsJYmoi4kfI0YGnUCpdp2Fk6TmqPbjvjvBdRvBZp 80kg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684228752; x=1686820752; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=y3MkdtHJ2Wn6h9YsBmYWmD4vsSF6yvzo+NF5U8NDuFA=; b=GR93MN1Dz6aQatInNAnmPtQbx8U2UziX8LybElYUjiF4XbesEJL532r4Ff8HGjlexV oseoSHKJaJJDyWghaGH/ldpXeNaAanX3YPjMva/R4B+9BZL73AHHCibXgRhWYrLdY0vk kUMBy1LElenOXRkyu2CYi/Zg/kIcLrKLY6CIC4uWJWXLTLaKvmDILoyD0Z1L+7xR72aD ITC09xy7D+aFE05JJ6+lp5vWC7YpQ5aWrMCaAJCJUpeR6S1iqlVEF+ZGbS+daCPTdGi3 6fsZ3SObXVQS9YhtUlQwGRVtPUEH01IgYfXEAX55SBbhdeLwbHqSDCWvhUbMxbKQEfix L5Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDx2FYI+EbYxFoc8vViaRIJMRLuR+t+Qo9w4BoLo97c0N/wTSgK3 OyHN2r8YxPzPD4dy4Jk7F2o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ505uRu6aCnAjzxPjg3zmhCDP2VDUbzyaYyhVG1tTnQMVN5NkjnjklVdIM7B2nUochZAOCRMA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2149:b0:3f5:1240:ace4 with SMTP id v9-20020a05600c214900b003f51240ace4mr1589722wml.25.1684228752006; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10-20020a05600c214a00b003f50e88ffb5sm1664081wml.24.2023.05.16.02.19.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 May 2023 02:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:19:10 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.2 000/242] 6.2.16-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230515161721.802179972@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230515161721.802179972@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 06:25:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.2.16 release. > There are 242 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3537 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3538 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip