From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1BAC7EE2E for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235921AbjFMMUD (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:20:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58412 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242465AbjFMMT7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:19:59 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A4A1738; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 05:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-4f122ff663eso6604443e87.2; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 05:19:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686658777; x=1689250777; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mzJgGG/CDYOhD2YNQTv2CpS/TSd4Qcu56zqodO6IyB4=; b=Qbe/SL0po5bwWWWFREV7MhlgjuwUoGjUD82KbJ/MQ2qc0C8XQmnPG3w2pzBDWaBxjq pHbZWbhF0e9FOhM1kxt3TbkRYjMuGDGI7W2r0DPVbQxlZgu+EgBeKAr/FARcUpP+88ds uS3SMi98EB6c502dbpLPxEkzoFpKcsxGPDkhXY3xCcvXZxCC+RJH7l3zfMmTUD/G7rbI NSz3t9a7S6sE6U0tHECE02oadhCvLOxmR5J+jF/ZLEMj+WczhTB6Jin8yS46gIvx2Q/D 2sYvlkQd2kYY2lvTMLf6cXTS0xuS9fnWaWKZoVFwDQiSglQ2pgErQ9jZqmEvXtrno1OC dNxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686658777; x=1689250777; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mzJgGG/CDYOhD2YNQTv2CpS/TSd4Qcu56zqodO6IyB4=; b=VjcHUBmsLtF8bdJLWlcTvJqEMhNPUpG6JcgvNamVUOtHSpeUoIhU/DJ6HzQABaqB96 QmI8EdqHzhim5vN/LuG9nK7BtWQsTCHjxc97qt4J1wsAoes4ZcVQ7ZEHqbfMWu6bZH2c 5/yb9Yo5QvE9sMSSu4zCSAUxwKHoRof9JJWV5dN0AsRRz3HlIh+nDMB5Xiri7W8U/GAG HQRCGR4CIfnbHJu46yRZkWn6YJpFixidyxXJ7mD8fqmbwQ7ERhtWI7qERuGisLHzCOqE SJcj9npRHSoHZMxYW4y3Yn1hxd7NzDihr0f6OBsKlGkMVp63MIMWjYXWjlG4AEK9FbbC OydA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwP/HPOTo3eojSqcLVkDz5hN1Gie/WYkiI8w/n7dGeDOtG7qiGC fVTg5ox3XbTcnQuYmH1FOQU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ73NS69UjggKVhkFEj2G1DBNP2JULH1k7n4O+6a0aEVHacXcSMiSNDEOlOremukbrwfskSwHw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:5f0d:0:b0:4f6:26de:502e with SMTP id t13-20020a195f0d000000b004f626de502emr5281226lfb.43.1686658777047; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 05:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x19-20020a1c7c13000000b003f7aad8c160sm14252269wmc.11.2023.06.13.05.19.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 13:19:34 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/91] 5.15.117-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230612101702.085813286@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230612101702.085813286@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 12:25:49PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.117 release. > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3932 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3919 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3918 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip