From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDA5EB64D7 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231741AbjFTLer (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:34:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58958 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229746AbjFTLeq (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:34:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5117FE; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-307d58b3efbso3619623f8f.0; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:34:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687260883; x=1689852883; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wNmsRYXp3LiMqLeElIlXoDkwLqAfcZRTSlTeIqHQMaw=; b=gwnNn5B6lVlUbAXTwAt+yfhy6qCOBy+QHoiWSvoijiW/fbPhfoQRhGpjlvbMJn8Quv Ol04JoXSx/BhqgeHX4cg4sXvYowweqDffc7xTIBt4nq3STc98+gZBAO8pDgRkMfRIUtQ CpBcqDpji77J/OEb8gfe1Q0NEZ0Ne136da7BUtnq3Tmk1LwNnKf4lOwwjZwdVNgy3J6s Y5e7LKaQggLU0sEFyMjgIQ4wEVVjBW8y3LCAXyafOg5rcUKto7lYRo9qIRE7R3LdGF0f jqY3T+U2gNjW0ZxFPXJ3YzITFh+rTm/gNWtdN9Q/USlC0jAcisPoq49h+r5DY5QbGp9k J/oA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687260883; x=1689852883; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=wNmsRYXp3LiMqLeElIlXoDkwLqAfcZRTSlTeIqHQMaw=; b=G/OL3hBGQEqFBJT5/TlyO02edEnGKZXRVbTM04PP3ZkG3ArA/Et1S2db89c/7xwWP8 im2ln4TCBZM/14Z+yvqwnoSENxthJ/ecNW+D125O1GI0c5XeP2IbeA1D9y8jOvdOkz5h jlf/DfRTxJpu78qB+RbJfYiAUjJzmB00pGROfPpqoDsL8rP7tqZRQggJPDjqJkcvH78y wubDrK0siWnT1G2Bc2Y32yYHMcB9RgHsNP7WQLZDGH5mn+sK1ZUMIm2s/8S4jILR1P2i pykBCKD6f4IIJ/a2uuS6aB+PxJIE8TRBJD33WYpFeBSi1qiR6MbqrnbHMfwxxlvO71GN JwWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwWbmQwCpcRVnNdA7O27jkQZZklG13WKwCJGYo4OZjsRfvWXQMK d8olGvlOetmlGyt/a57OAM4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7FRsTITb47OtP9ObIFUmd0XF8iyk78I8fpCv07AssJh1O0cUuctFjrufZYXNKwsEQuA04d/A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6289:0:b0:311:ac3:909f with SMTP id k9-20020a5d6289000000b003110ac3909fmr8263127wru.56.1687260883200; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i14-20020a5d558e000000b0030ab5ebefa8sm1795944wrv.46.2023.06.20.04.34.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:34:40 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/107] 5.15.118-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230619102141.541044823@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230619102141.541044823@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:29:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.118 release. > There are 107 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4074 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4072 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4070 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip