From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A86EB64D7 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232116AbjFTLtF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:49:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38954 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231954AbjFTLtF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 07:49:05 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3352186; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-312826ffedbso350503f8f.0; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687261742; x=1689853742; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KcYpNVQaGyRkwsi0hWgjQRd/rnueYbvh3KZf7v3ooec=; b=PSs+fr8/kRZ9Rp/e1xBLEc9BrCw/XN3RVLm9JTgXJoK1c2LeNv/Ee+HciskEgp5C8G /0a57Z5WfpEUM98+fIrDLzgnvzFGx1kIej+0xmdEroWMZdbEq0skYJXWrxnHs8vRmaQC AOkzfZo489qflGRqkG/anzvKXQsnRXv+ePHOLvm8cKwG8wmG07PHTFZi9tCmi9Z78h5L lv0qA/kgCQvOsNKbj+oVP4hXaWYgF31hKGozdBus0FPO9TqGS01U0l8+NlqJ+BKkIxRB yt6kK9S5/fvUwtGWYmDprdWCJJN28qiWd9GcuBdzeuL3CxFdT8TpBC5cULW95eeIdX+e +PXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687261742; x=1689853742; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KcYpNVQaGyRkwsi0hWgjQRd/rnueYbvh3KZf7v3ooec=; b=IRSe6EMmE1ffWJTh6vfJC0DWub+dwYzd13SzTsnj7vf9o8QjwlVRkcM/HPr2L4D9qd eYhT4/VYoVwNQQZ01w+KxqzcWQzMxWFUM6jF2klmr2FFcZT1n8wVRfPSxt2MGkopQn0+ 61/hqrN20YH64XJSn8ZOjRYJgmEb5OA25BuPnpxQQAvbPuA1hZr2pqjOE+tgdyG+NGfj FbchVfa793QLdBdJP4p2cN2jORqYVnfEqR1decNSNcG6O++XccBUkEqlez6XXVFAFYiD WH8jmJ6+ohPHQ8yjtHCFXAmVuCiTXPTr+NwX9l6Ou8sL+LrxlWKUlxKmXw3QL21KYpI+ JS7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxZD2390PIVSfoCj5NOBH/aD4XwizupgiLp0YH9+OxsdTdj7Nv1 JFLSVJggBFK9gaJyq+lf5Bk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7sjaqbnzfBCWe+7Igx4XocK4yNn7Slik/papkIcItK+cnTPMWY+pyjVfzRTeoFBIHvFSVW/w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:510a:0:b0:306:2a1a:d265 with SMTP id s10-20020a5d510a000000b003062a1ad265mr5953213wrt.58.1687261742074; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:49:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10-20020a5d69ca000000b003047ea78b42sm1820542wrw.43.2023.06.20.04.49.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Jun 2023 04:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:49:00 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/166] 6.1.35-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230619102154.568541872@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230619102154.568541872@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:27:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.35 release. > There are 166 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4075 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4076 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4077 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip