From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3E2EB64DC for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 13:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229523AbjGCN5u (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:57:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229484AbjGCN5t (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:57:49 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 036C4E51 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 06:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2b699a2fe86so74198471fa.3 for ; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 06:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1688392666; x=1690984666; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PKlR/17zBBOm87/ERZ/UgMSxJea1HiQOEOXEkvHkmd8=; b=PaExsTHmnVLcUii2/kshU7xQ7UsndZVhnIf4YWBJMUlmMnAEL2Fa8rBV/5nVsXPLtp /ArWTI0tFnVgmYQ/O7G+guYMgEKb4wXHlx8QJAM1jpdxYQvhiDH41YSwbyXWX0DDFkc5 1DMSb77BmfjXRpU+AXOgAKOVwusQEFdsAP6I+giQt0vNi+Ayq/hfdO3eJTa2t6MnptCp e9VyGgsOiC8hDRJ4EezCq4yXDDvb5LnGVuTygKkUXzilIlJnulMhqti040vNxjAlrov9 gfiAG2VQQVKmgf6RvwI4w9CJhRm231tDS+F2At6Ao6RtOuXnheMwkslDSQY813G5a6uL lEFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1688392666; x=1690984666; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PKlR/17zBBOm87/ERZ/UgMSxJea1HiQOEOXEkvHkmd8=; b=S91M486hQV0kwEhil/0R97N0dgZXrOPGK1hnGyoMOCqvg1hCTtUhRyh7ouxQiHGcQ1 qlX0vg5b2FjBa/z828F7SYicmFOBYdEkRaaQVDamkvoXj1EX5Bb9M9yOU+9gfLNlrYsN 2ak2mqAqyZ0MzNAMwQwFz8Z0McN9tEDLLfnG0UJQUBK3Z2C/M0acDLn1ULVl4lwGAKwG AviofUqkNw8smTUZzHdD+FI4xSCZ2cVhoWwNV9LLpUlv2qbrcIvsIVd0rvgF6vV4HcOl DmjXCtjJSYtq4ug+0tvNMD0AAWu0I0xaIjQstB9GQph1IPv/1VrvKEcd7Q6NIVuw36yu MNnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbNPyJMphI84nHfdDwV+aUuhqcrWyXYBXWAB7iREnDUzAVqmFGD z8YFrAyutCOJ9P3OGY5khuU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEjtAu6fwqxU8bio+kqvjipP02DjJCXlp59Cuax6A+JXSJcUNt07ThdpT2s05dON86kjoSnZg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3507:0:b0:2b6:eee2:99b0 with SMTP id z7-20020a2e3507000000b002b6eee299b0mr656660ljz.37.1688392665935; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eldamar.lan (c-82-192-242-114.customer.ggaweb.ch. [82.192.242.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kt19-20020a170906aad300b009894b476310sm12090368ejb.163.2023.07.03.06.57.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Jul 2023 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Salvatore Bonaccorso Received: by eldamar.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75AB5BE2DE0; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:57:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 15:57:44 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: Greg KH , "Limonciello, Mario" Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Regression in 6.1.35 / 6.3.9 Message-ID: References: <2023062808-mangy-vineyard-4f66@gregkh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2023062808-mangy-vineyard-4f66@gregkh> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Mario, On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:16:25PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 05:56:01PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > > [Public] > > > > Hi, > > A regression was reported in 6.4-rc6 that monitor resolutions are no longer present for anything but native resolution on eDP panels. This specific change backported into stable at 6.1.35 and 6.3.9: > > e749dd10e5f29 ("drm/amd/display: edp do not add non-edid timings") > > > > After discussing it with the original author, they submitted a revert commit for review: > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/544273/ > > > > I suggested the revert also CC stable, and I expect this will go up in 6.5-rc1, but given the timing of the merge window and the original issue hit the stable trees, can we revert it sooner in the stable > > trees to avoid exposing the regression to more people? > > As the submitted patch had the wrong git id, it might be good to be able > to take a real one? I can take it once it shows up in linux-next if > it's really going to be going into 6.5, but I need a stable git id for > it. Do you know, did that felt trough the cracks or is it still planned to do the revert? Regards, Salvatore