From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5ECC83F11 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 08:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230247AbjH0Iod (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:44:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230257AbjH0Io2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2023 04:44:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A35EDE; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-31c6d17aec4so1893744f8f.1; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:44:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693125864; x=1693730664; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O8fElRcs3PkUY8Q02I9sE417svoQVgtmV0B5qTTy35g=; b=PWoIC2Fqvh4JPT0mV5SHB697KI4aSaB086YLt9z5rFSms+bENpXTDDprLakZ2h5lae OS7JepK6YVfLGTiMEDpMSIzk7JGzt0AeZtpXfhJrk8YmFvUWByPSClCrN990pjaF2r4k QSEQOUOGfmZeLNvh/KW82X+KuEIkJ1Avag5bEfbNKUKTV6QQTXLqA6Zc0Y4s1y6Zwy19 tK4oYFXGHE/HFSofCn7TnPpWj2Y2ET7Agw404Q7e/jcQj0WWa6eTtE5l/wDat62dsqJT JTAvkkbFHr9mb+M5MszYXclJyqRu3CBkmjbvKQ7NgLaJ8M5Fmb94Aw1eiIDDmlUWhSgx WOww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693125864; x=1693730664; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=O8fElRcs3PkUY8Q02I9sE417svoQVgtmV0B5qTTy35g=; b=JtXteySypG4bzpwvoV+673+BpLDVwU3J5EDNZ2JKGoIEjDjJvYpQ5Avo6kqWbQmPKW XCY4UJuqSVwSw3JAaL5raU9uYtw/k4HDz9rdBsoF0FrP8s7Vge3M8x67OUzNXoRYDPpD XupbedbPHcHiyrgzubp6YgDXq14c1t0Nncadjnoe4U2HlZwfKyleFjhofXs+ecA3r6L8 vnh0zDnpRLFM8wV3UOZLh/zrfaZiG7jvxq3CZ2649oNbRrUSLHPlGOmmEeWDWVibceLE k6hOsPxDqjeQzDEaDX1suOKiZ5jZVY6Gw6Z8xXI5b+T+FdkUoK4gntZh+r3pF97tctmq MMkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwkUdLNN1X3Hafo88kOyjkENLsDvVfHSQzwW6zInGI+Sv4eabTU NcMy9qJJmwfm6KMxvlXnC2g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFh9IYLC2/wjGRLv3SITjKE0sIgxuBuO/y76BZulsNmwpk0RjC+eZ3P+DtP+ZRyw+cifNOBQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa52:0:b0:317:393f:6e6a with SMTP id y18-20020adffa52000000b00317393f6e6amr18476798wrr.59.1693125863878; Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w4-20020adfde84000000b003143b14848dsm6948603wrl.102.2023.08.27.01.44.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 09:44:21 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/4] 6.1.49-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230826154625.450325166@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230826154625.450325166@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 05:47:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.49 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:46:14 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 13.2.1 20230826): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4805 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4807 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/4806 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip