public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"# 5 . 16" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: usb: typec: ucsi: Clear EVENT_PENDING bit if ucsi_send_command fails
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:49:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZP8M6zqgsLTK25PI@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1694423055-8440-1-git-send-email-quic_prashk@quicinc.com>

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:34:15PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
> Currently if ucsi_send_command() fails, then we bail out without
> clearing EVENT_PENDING flag. So when the next connector change
> event comes, ucsi_connector_change() won't queue the con->work,
> because of which none of the new events will be processed.
> 
> Fix this by clearing EVENT_PENDING flag if ucsi_send_command()
> fails.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16
> Fixes: 512df95b9432 ("usb: typec: ucsi: Better fix for missing unplug events issue")
> Signed-off-by: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> index c6dfe3d..509c67c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> @@ -884,6 +884,7 @@ static void ucsi_handle_connector_change(struct work_struct *work)
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(ucsi->dev, "%s: GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS failed (%d)\n",
>  			__func__, ret);
> +		clear_bit(EVENT_PENDING, &con->ucsi->flags);
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  	}

I think it would be better to just move that label (out_unlock) above
the point where clear_bit() is already called instead of separately
calling it like that. That way the Connector Change Event will
also get acknowledged.

If this really can happen, then I think it would be good to also
schedule a task for ucsi_check_connection():

        if (ret < 0) {
                dev_err(ucsi->dev, "%s: GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS failed (%d)\n",
                        __func__, ret);
+               ucsi_partner_task(con, ucsi_check_connection, 1, HZ);
                goto out_unlock;
        }

thanks,

-- 
heikki

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-11 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-11  9:04 usb: typec: ucsi: Clear EVENT_PENDING bit if ucsi_send_command fails Prashanth K
2023-09-11 12:49 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2023-09-12 11:07   ` Prashanth K
2023-09-15 12:32     ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-09-15 13:40       ` Prashanth K
2023-09-15 13:57         ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-09-16  8:28           ` Prashanth K
2023-09-18 14:25             ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-09-18 15:18               ` Prashanth K
2023-09-18 14:26 ` Heikki Krogerus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZP8M6zqgsLTK25PI@kuha.fi.intel.com \
    --to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_prashk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox