From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"# 5 . 16" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: usb: typec: ucsi: Clear EVENT_PENDING bit if ucsi_send_command fails
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:49:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZP8M6zqgsLTK25PI@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1694423055-8440-1-git-send-email-quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:34:15PM +0530, Prashanth K wrote:
> Currently if ucsi_send_command() fails, then we bail out without
> clearing EVENT_PENDING flag. So when the next connector change
> event comes, ucsi_connector_change() won't queue the con->work,
> because of which none of the new events will be processed.
>
> Fix this by clearing EVENT_PENDING flag if ucsi_send_command()
> fails.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.16
> Fixes: 512df95b9432 ("usb: typec: ucsi: Better fix for missing unplug events issue")
> Signed-off-by: Prashanth K <quic_prashk@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> index c6dfe3d..509c67c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c
> @@ -884,6 +884,7 @@ static void ucsi_handle_connector_change(struct work_struct *work)
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(ucsi->dev, "%s: GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS failed (%d)\n",
> __func__, ret);
> + clear_bit(EVENT_PENDING, &con->ucsi->flags);
> goto out_unlock;
> }
I think it would be better to just move that label (out_unlock) above
the point where clear_bit() is already called instead of separately
calling it like that. That way the Connector Change Event will
also get acknowledged.
If this really can happen, then I think it would be good to also
schedule a task for ucsi_check_connection():
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(ucsi->dev, "%s: GET_CONNECTOR_STATUS failed (%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
+ ucsi_partner_task(con, ucsi_check_connection, 1, HZ);
goto out_unlock;
}
thanks,
--
heikki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-11 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-11 9:04 usb: typec: ucsi: Clear EVENT_PENDING bit if ucsi_send_command fails Prashanth K
2023-09-11 12:49 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2023-09-12 11:07 ` Prashanth K
2023-09-15 12:32 ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-09-15 13:40 ` Prashanth K
2023-09-15 13:57 ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-09-16 8:28 ` Prashanth K
2023-09-18 14:25 ` Heikki Krogerus
2023-09-18 15:18 ` Prashanth K
2023-09-18 14:26 ` Heikki Krogerus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZP8M6zqgsLTK25PI@kuha.fi.intel.com \
--to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_prashk@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox