From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD293C61D9D for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344205AbjKVRcl (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:32:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47974 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344075AbjKVRck (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:32:40 -0500 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [IPv6:2001:780:45:1d:225:90ff:fe52:c662]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2F319D; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [78.30.43.141] (port=43328 helo=gnumonks.org) by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r5r5S-00Dh8f-Na; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:32:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:32:29 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Sasha Levin Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -stable,5.4 23/26] netfilter: nftables: update table flags from the commit phase Message-ID: References: <20231121121333.294238-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20231121121333.294238-24-pablo@netfilter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:21:51AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 01:13:30PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > commit 0ce7cf4127f14078ca598ba9700d813178a59409 upstream. > > > > Do not update table flags from the preparation phase. Store the flags > > update into the transaction, then update the flags from the commit > > phase. > > We don't seem to have this or the following commits in the 5.10 tree, > are they just not needed there? Let me have a look at 5.10, 23/26, 24/26 and 25/26 are likely candidates. But not 26/26 in this series. Let me test them and I will send you a specific patch series in another mail thread for 5.10 if they are required. Thanks for the notice.