From: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 16:48:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXgedtUhbKEwtSMr@yujie-X299> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZXdJZ6yfK0NWz_zj@hovoldconsulting.com>
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 06:39:51PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 01:28:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your patch.
> >
> > FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
> >
> > The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1
> >
> > Rule: add the tag "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" in the sign-off area to have the patch automatically included in the stable tree.
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes
^
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20231211132608.27861-3-johan%2Blinaro%40kernel.org
>
> Please fix your robot. This is a series of stable kernel backports so
> the above warning makes no sense.
Sorry for this wrong report. We introduced b4 tool into the robot
recently to help simplify patch processing, but seems that b4
automatically removed the "stable-6.6" prefix in the patch subject when
grabbing the mail thread, and triggered this wrong report. We've fixed
this issue for the bot just now.
$ b4 am https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231211132608.27861-3-johan+linaro@kernel.org/
Cover: ./20231211_johan_linaro_asoc_qcom_sc8280xp_limit_speaker_digital_volumes.cover
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211132608.27861-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Base: not specified
git am ./20231211_johan_linaro_asoc_qcom_sc8280xp_limit_speaker_digital_volumes.mbx
$ grep -h ^Subject *johan_linaro*
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ops: add correct range check for limiting volume
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes
Best Regards,
Yujie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-12 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-11 13:26 [PATCH stable-6.6 0/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes Johan Hovold
2023-12-11 13:26 ` [PATCH stable-6.6 1/2] ASoC: ops: add correct range check for limiting volume Johan Hovold
2023-12-11 13:26 ` [PATCH stable-6.6 2/2] ASoC: qcom: sc8280xp: Limit speaker digital volumes Johan Hovold
2023-12-11 17:28 ` [PATCH " kernel test robot
2023-12-11 17:39 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-12 8:48 ` Yujie Liu [this message]
2023-12-13 12:32 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-11 13:40 ` [PATCH stable-6.6 0/2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXgedtUhbKEwtSMr@yujie-X299 \
--to=yujie.liu@intel.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox