public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: linux-5.15.y ksmbd backport for CVE-2023-38431
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 23:18:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXvTnMWF/G/RrthX@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023121407-composed-unscathed-5081@gregkh>

[Re: [PATCH 0/1] RFC: linux-5.15.y ksmbd backport for CVE-2023-38431] On 14/12/2023 (Thu 09:20) Greg KH wrote:

[...]

> > > If no one steps up, I'll just mark the thing as broken, it is _so_ far
> > > behind in patches that it's just sad.
> > 
> > Again, in this case - I have no problem with that - but as a note of
> > record -- whenever linux-stable removes a Kconfig, either explicitly or
> > by a depends on BROKEN - it does trigger fallout for some people.
> 
> In what way?  Just having to update default config options?
> 
> > The Yocto/OE does an audit on the Kconfig output looking for options
> > that were explicitly set (or un-set) by the user, or by base templates.
> > If they don't land in the final .config file -- it lets you know.
> 
> So defconfig type checks?

Here is a recent example.

https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/13387

I am not saying linux-stable is wrong to do these kinds of changes, I'm
just saying there is an impact that people might not be aware of.

Paul.
--

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-15  4:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-12 18:47 [PATCH 0/1] RFC: linux-5.15.y ksmbd backport for CVE-2023-38431 paul.gortmaker
2023-12-12 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] ksmbd: check the validation of pdu_size in ksmbd_conn_handler_loop paul.gortmaker
2023-12-13  4:59   ` Namjae Jeon
2023-12-18 10:38   ` Greg KH
2023-12-18 11:28     ` Namjae Jeon
2023-12-18 11:38       ` Greg KH
2023-12-12 20:04 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: linux-5.15.y ksmbd backport for CVE-2023-38431 Greg KH
2023-12-12 20:13   ` [EXTERNAL] " Steven French
2023-12-12 20:52     ` Paul Gortmaker
2023-12-12 21:15       ` Steven French
2023-12-13 14:36     ` Greg KH
2023-12-13 23:31       ` Namjae Jeon
2023-12-14  8:05         ` Greg KH
2023-12-14 11:33           ` Namjae Jeon
2023-12-14 11:58             ` Greg KH
2023-12-14 13:58               ` Namjae Jeon
2023-12-12 20:45   ` Paul Gortmaker
2023-12-13 14:34     ` Greg KH
2023-12-14  3:28       ` Paul Gortmaker
2023-12-14  8:20         ` Greg KH
2023-12-15  4:18           ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2023-12-13  5:13 ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXvTnMWF/G/RrthX@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox