* [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure [not found] <20231221154702.2267684-1-guoren@kernel.org> @ 2023-12-21 15:46 ` guoren 2023-12-22 1:51 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end guoren 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: guoren @ 2023-12-21 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, guoren, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, leobras Cc: linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole rootfs is rv32. Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K Run /sbin/init as init process Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) Run /etc/init as init process ... Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> --- arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) #else -- 2.40.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure 2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure guoren @ 2023-12-22 1:51 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 2:57 ` Guo Ren 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guoren Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable Hello Guo Ren, On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:58AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is > 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user > segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole > rootfs is rv32. Checking if I get the scenario: In pgtable.h: #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT #define TASK_SIZE_64 (PGDIR_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT #define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) #else [...] Meaning CONFIG_COMPAT is only available in CONFIG_64BIT, and TASK_SIZE in compat mode is either TASK_SIZE_32 or TASK_SIZE_64 depending on the thread_flag. from processor.h: #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 [...] #define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW where: #define MMAP_VA_BITS (is_compat_task() ? VA_BITS_SV32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64) with MMAP_VA_BITS_64 being either 48 or 37. In compat mode, STACK_TOP = 1 << (32 - 1) -> 0x80000000 TASK_SIZE = 0x8000000 - 4k -> 0x7ffff000 IIUC, your suggestion is to make TASK_SIZE = STACK_TOP in compat mode only. Then why not: #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT #define TASK_SIZE_32 STACK_TOP With some comments explaining why there is no need to reserve a PAGE_SIZE in the TASK_SIZE_32. Does that make sense? Thanks! Leo > > Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K > Run /sbin/init as init process > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) > Run /etc/init as init process > ... > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > #else > -- > 2.40.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure 2023-12-22 1:51 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 2:57 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 3:50 ` Charlie Jenkins 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:51 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello Guo Ren, > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:58AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is > > 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user > > segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole > > rootfs is rv32. > > Checking if I get the scenario: > > In pgtable.h: > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > #define TASK_SIZE_64 (PGDIR_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > #define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > #else > [...] > > Meaning CONFIG_COMPAT is only available in CONFIG_64BIT, and TASK_SIZE in > compat mode is either TASK_SIZE_32 or TASK_SIZE_64 depending on the thread_flag. > > from processor.h: > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > [...] > #define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW > > > where: > #define MMAP_VA_BITS (is_compat_task() ? VA_BITS_SV32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64) > with MMAP_VA_BITS_64 being either 48 or 37. > > In compat mode, > STACK_TOP = 1 << (32 - 1) -> 0x80000000 > TASK_SIZE = 0x8000000 - 4k -> 0x7ffff000 > > IIUC, your suggestion is to make TASK_SIZE = STACK_TOP in compat mode only. Yes, it causes the problem, which causes the boot to fail. > > Then why not: > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > #define TASK_SIZE_32 STACK_TOP Yes, it's the solution that I think at first. But I didn't find any problem with 0x7ffff000 ~ 0x80000000, and then I removed this gap to unify it with Sv39 and Sv48. > > With some comments explaining why there is no need to reserve a PAGE_SIZE > in the TASK_SIZE_32. At first, I wanted to put a invalid page between the user & kernel space, but it seems useless. > > Does that make sense? > > Thanks! > Leo > > > > > Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K > > Run /sbin/init as init process > > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) > > Run /etc/init as init process > > ... > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) > > > > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > #else > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure 2023-12-22 2:57 ` Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 3:50 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 4:32 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 10:58 ` Guo Ren 0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guo Ren Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:57:16AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:51 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hello Guo Ren, > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:58AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is > > > 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user > > > segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole > > > rootfs is rv32. > > > > Checking if I get the scenario: > > > > In pgtable.h: > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > #define TASK_SIZE_64 (PGDIR_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > #else > > [...] > > > > Meaning CONFIG_COMPAT is only available in CONFIG_64BIT, and TASK_SIZE in > > compat mode is either TASK_SIZE_32 or TASK_SIZE_64 depending on the thread_flag. > > > > from processor.h: > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > [...] > > #define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW > > > > > > where: > > #define MMAP_VA_BITS (is_compat_task() ? VA_BITS_SV32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64) > > with MMAP_VA_BITS_64 being either 48 or 37. > > > > In compat mode, > > STACK_TOP = 1 << (32 - 1) -> 0x80000000 > > TASK_SIZE = 0x8000000 - 4k -> 0x7ffff000 > > > > IIUC, your suggestion is to make TASK_SIZE = STACK_TOP in compat mode only. > Yes, it causes the problem, which causes the boot to fail. I think what Leonardo is getting at is that it is odd that it would cause boot issues if TASK_SIZE is not equal STACK_TOP. This seems indicative of a different problem. While this may fix the issue, it should be valid for TASK_SIZE to be less than STACK_TOP. - Charlie > > > > > Then why not: > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 STACK_TOP > Yes, it's the solution that I think at first. But I didn't find any > problem with 0x7ffff000 ~ 0x80000000, and then I removed this gap to > unify it with Sv39 and Sv48. > > > > > With some comments explaining why there is no need to reserve a PAGE_SIZE > > in the TASK_SIZE_32. > At first, I wanted to put a invalid page between the user & kernel > space, but it seems useless. > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > Thanks! > > Leo > > > > > > > > Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K > > > Run /sbin/init as init process > > > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) > > > Run /etc/init as init process > > > ... > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) > > > > > > > > > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > #else > > > -- > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure 2023-12-22 3:50 ` Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 4:32 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 7:33 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 10:58 ` Guo Ren 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Charlie Jenkins Cc: Leonardo Bras, Guo Ren, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:50:27PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:57:16AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:51 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Guo Ren, > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:58AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is > > > > 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user > > > > segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole > > > > rootfs is rv32. > > > > > > Checking if I get the scenario: > > > > > > In pgtable.h: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define TASK_SIZE_64 (PGDIR_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > #else > > > [...] > > > > > > Meaning CONFIG_COMPAT is only available in CONFIG_64BIT, and TASK_SIZE in > > > compat mode is either TASK_SIZE_32 or TASK_SIZE_64 depending on the thread_flag. > > > > > > from processor.h: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > [...] > > > #define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW > > > > > > > > > where: > > > #define MMAP_VA_BITS (is_compat_task() ? VA_BITS_SV32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64) > > > with MMAP_VA_BITS_64 being either 48 or 37. > > > > > > In compat mode, > > > STACK_TOP = 1 << (32 - 1) -> 0x80000000 > > > TASK_SIZE = 0x8000000 - 4k -> 0x7ffff000 > > > > > > IIUC, your suggestion is to make TASK_SIZE = STACK_TOP in compat mode only. > > Yes, it causes the problem, which causes the boot to fail. > > I think what Leonardo is getting at is that it is odd that it would > cause boot issues if TASK_SIZE is not equal STACK_TOP. This seems > indicative of a different problem. While this may fix the issue, it > should be valid for TASK_SIZE to be less than STACK_TOP. > > - Charlie > That is also a good point, but I am not that acquainted to this to actually propose this. I was thinking more on these questions: Is TASK_SIZE and STACK_TOP related somehow? If so, would not be better to describe one in terms of the other, like #define TASK_SIZE (STACK_TOP - PAGE_SIZE) Or the other way around. I mean, if they have any relation it would be much easier to represent them that way, and it would avoid having two magical numbers. Thanks! Leo > > > > > > > > Then why not: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 STACK_TOP > > Yes, it's the solution that I think at first. But I didn't find any > > problem with 0x7ffff000 ~ 0x80000000, and then I removed this gap to > > unify it with Sv39 and Sv48. > > > > > > > > With some comments explaining why there is no need to reserve a PAGE_SIZE > > > in the TASK_SIZE_32. > > At first, I wanted to put a invalid page between the user & kernel > > space, but it seems useless. > > > > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K > > > > Run /sbin/init as init process > > > > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) > > > > Run /etc/init as init process > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > > +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > > #else > > > > -- > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Guo Ren > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure 2023-12-22 4:32 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 7:33 ` Guo Ren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: Charlie Jenkins, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:33 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:50:27PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:57:16AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:51 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Guo Ren, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:58AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > > > In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is > > > > > 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user > > > > > segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole > > > > > rootfs is rv32. > > > > > > > > Checking if I get the scenario: > > > > > > > > In pgtable.h: > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_64 (PGDIR_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > > #else > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Meaning CONFIG_COMPAT is only available in CONFIG_64BIT, and TASK_SIZE in > > > > compat mode is either TASK_SIZE_32 or TASK_SIZE_64 depending on the thread_flag. > > > > > > > > from processor.h: > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > [...] > > > > #define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW > > > > > > > > > > > > where: > > > > #define MMAP_VA_BITS (is_compat_task() ? VA_BITS_SV32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64) > > > > with MMAP_VA_BITS_64 being either 48 or 37. > > > > > > > > In compat mode, > > > > STACK_TOP = 1 << (32 - 1) -> 0x80000000 > > > > TASK_SIZE = 0x8000000 - 4k -> 0x7ffff000 > > > > > > > > IIUC, your suggestion is to make TASK_SIZE = STACK_TOP in compat mode only. > > > Yes, it causes the problem, which causes the boot to fail. > > > > I think what Leonardo is getting at is that it is odd that it would > > cause boot issues if TASK_SIZE is not equal STACK_TOP. This seems > > indicative of a different problem. While this may fix the issue, it > > should be valid for TASK_SIZE to be less than STACK_TOP. > > > > - Charlie > > > > That is also a good point, but I am not that acquainted to this to > actually propose this. > > I was thinking more on these questions: > Is TASK_SIZE and STACK_TOP related somehow? > If so, would not be better to describe one in terms of the other, like > #define TASK_SIZE (STACK_TOP - PAGE_SIZE) TASK_SIZE means the maximum user address space, so it's the limitation to any kind of mmap or stack ... So STACK_TOP <= TASK_SIZE Follow your idea. The question is: #define TASK_SIZE ((UL(1) << (VA_BITS - 1)) - PAGE_SIZE) Do we need to reserve one page between userspace & kernel? > > Or the other way around. > > I mean, if they have any relation it would be much easier to represent them > that way, and it would avoid having two magical numbers. > > Thanks! > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > Then why not: > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 STACK_TOP > > > Yes, it's the solution that I think at first. But I didn't find any > > > problem with 0x7ffff000 ~ 0x80000000, and then I removed this gap to > > > unify it with Sv39 and Sv48. > > > > > > > > > > > With some comments explaining why there is no need to reserve a PAGE_SIZE > > > > in the TASK_SIZE_32. > > > At first, I wanted to put a invalid page between the user & kernel > > > space, but it seems useless. > > > > > > > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K > > > > > Run /sbin/init as init process > > > > > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) > > > > > Run /etc/init as init process > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > > index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) > > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > > -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > > > +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > > > #else > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards > > > Guo Ren > > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure 2023-12-22 3:50 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 4:32 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 10:58 ` Guo Ren 1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Charlie Jenkins Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable Hello Charlie, On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:50 AM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:57:16AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 9:51 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Guo Ren, > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:58AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > In COMPAT mode, the STACK_TOP is 0x80000000, but the TASK_SIZE is > > > > 0x7fff000. When the user stack is upon 0x7fff000, it will cause a user > > > > segment fault. Sometimes, it would cause boot failure when the whole > > > > rootfs is rv32. > > > > > > Checking if I get the scenario: > > > > > > In pgtable.h: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define TASK_SIZE_64 (PGDIR_SIZE * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > #else > > > [...] > > > > > > Meaning CONFIG_COMPAT is only available in CONFIG_64BIT, and TASK_SIZE in > > > compat mode is either TASK_SIZE_32 or TASK_SIZE_64 depending on the thread_flag. > > > > > > from processor.h: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > [...] > > > #define STACK_TOP DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW > > > > > > > > > where: > > > #define MMAP_VA_BITS (is_compat_task() ? VA_BITS_SV32 : MMAP_VA_BITS_64) > > > with MMAP_VA_BITS_64 being either 48 or 37. > > > > > > In compat mode, > > > STACK_TOP = 1 << (32 - 1) -> 0x80000000 > > > TASK_SIZE = 0x8000000 - 4k -> 0x7ffff000 > > > > > > IIUC, your suggestion is to make TASK_SIZE = STACK_TOP in compat mode only. > > Yes, it causes the problem, which causes the boot to fail. > > I think what Leonardo is getting at is that it is odd that it would > cause boot issues if TASK_SIZE is not equal STACK_TOP. This seems > indicative of a different problem. While this may fix the issue, it > should be valid for TASK_SIZE to be less than STACK_TOP. Sorry, I don't make sense here. Why do you think STACK_TOP could > TASK_SIZE? TASK_SIZE is the highest priority of the address limitation for user-space address, right? Do you mean: STACK_TOP could > MMAP_END? > > - Charlie > > > > > > > > > Then why not: > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > #define TASK_SIZE_32 STACK_TOP > > Yes, it's the solution that I think at first. But I didn't find any > > problem with 0x7ffff000 ~ 0x80000000, and then I removed this gap to > > unify it with Sv39 and Sv48. > > > > > > > > With some comments explaining why there is no need to reserve a PAGE_SIZE > > > in the TASK_SIZE_32. > > At first, I wanted to put a invalid page between the user & kernel > > space, but it seems useless. > > > > > > > > Does that make sense? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 2236K > > > > Run /sbin/init as init process > > > > Starting init: /sbin/init exists but couldn't execute it (error -14) > > > > Run /etc/init as init process > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > index ab00235b018f..74ffb2178f54 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h > > > > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte) > > > > #define TASK_SIZE_MIN (PGDIR_SIZE_L3 * PTRS_PER_PGD / 2) > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > > -#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL) - PAGE_SIZE) > > > > +#define TASK_SIZE_32 (_AC(0x80000000, UL)) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define TASK_SIZE (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \ > > > > TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > > #else > > > > -- > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Guo Ren -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end [not found] <20231221154702.2267684-1-guoren@kernel.org> 2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure guoren @ 2023-12-21 15:46 ` guoren 2023-12-22 3:34 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 8:59 ` David Laight 1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: guoren @ 2023-12-21 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, guoren, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, leobras Cc: linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE directly. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> --- arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ ({ \ unsigned long mmap_end; \ typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ -- 2.40.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end guoren @ 2023-12-22 3:34 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 4:04 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 4:26 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 8:59 ` David Laight 1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: guoren Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > directly. ok > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n Makes sense for me. > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > ({ \ > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. Before: - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 Now: - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 if addr != 0. Is that desireable? (if not, above change is unneeded) Also, unrelated to the change: - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 Is the above correct? It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. Do I get it wrong? (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look like) Thanks, Leo > -- > 2.40.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 3:34 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 4:04 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 4:23 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 4:36 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 4:26 ` Guo Ren 1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: guoren, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:34:56AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > directly. > > ok > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > ({ \ > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > Before: > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > Now: > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > (if not, above change is unneeded) I agree, this change does not make sense for compat mode. Compat mode should never return an address that is greater than 2^32, but this change allows that. > > Also, unrelated to the change: > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > Is the above correct? > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. That is not the case. I documented this behavior and reasoning in Documentation/arch/riscv/vm-layout.rst in the "Userspace VAs" section. I can reiterate here though. The hint address to mmap (defined here as "addr") is the maximum userspace address that mmap should provide. What you are describing is a minimum. The purpose of this change was to allow applications that are not compatible with a larger virtual address (such as applications like Java that use the upper bits of the VA to store data) to have a consistent way of specifying how many bits they would like to be left free in the VA. This requires to take the next lowest address space to guaruntee that all of the most-significant bits left clear in hint address do not end up populated in the virtual address returned by mmap. - Charlie > > Do I get it wrong? > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > like) > > Thanks, > Leo > > > > > > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 4:04 ` Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 4:23 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 5:42 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 4:36 ` Guo Ren 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Charlie Jenkins Cc: Leonardo Bras, guoren, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:04:43PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:34:56AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > directly. > > > > ok > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > ({ \ > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > > Before: > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > Now: > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > I agree, this change does not make sense for compat mode. Compat mode > should never return an address that is greater than 2^32, but this > change allows that. > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > Is the above correct? > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > That is not the case. I documented this behavior and reasoning in > Documentation/arch/riscv/vm-layout.rst in the "Userspace VAs" section. > > I can reiterate here though. The hint address to mmap (defined here as > "addr") is the maximum userspace address that mmap should provide. What > you are describing is a minimum. The purpose of this change was to allow > applications that are not compatible with a larger virtual address (such > as applications like Java that use the upper bits of the VA to store > data) to have a consistent way of specifying how many bits they would > like to be left free in the VA. This requires to take the next lowest > address space to guaruntee that all of the most-significant bits left > clear in hint address do not end up populated in the virtual address > returned by mmap. > > - Charlie Hello Charlie, thank you for helping me understand! Ok, that does make sense now! The addr value hints "don't allocate > addr" and thus: - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 Ok, but then - addr > 2^57: mmap_end = 2^57 right? I mean, probably STACK_TOP_MAX in non-compat mode means 2^57 already, but having it explicitly like: else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ mmap_end = VA_USER_SV57; \ would not be better for a future full 64-bit addressing? (since it's already on a different if clause) I could add comment on top of the macro with a short version on your addr hint description above. Would that be ok? Thanks! Leo > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > like) > > > > Thanks, > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 4:23 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 5:42 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 8:27 ` Leonardo Bras 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: guoren, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 01:23:29AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:04:43PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:34:56AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > > directly. > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > > ({ \ > > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > > > > Before: > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > Now: > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > > > I agree, this change does not make sense for compat mode. Compat mode > > should never return an address that is greater than 2^32, but this > > change allows that. > > > > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > Is the above correct? > > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > That is not the case. I documented this behavior and reasoning in > > Documentation/arch/riscv/vm-layout.rst in the "Userspace VAs" section. > > > > I can reiterate here though. The hint address to mmap (defined here as > > "addr") is the maximum userspace address that mmap should provide. What > > you are describing is a minimum. The purpose of this change was to allow > > applications that are not compatible with a larger virtual address (such > > as applications like Java that use the upper bits of the VA to store > > data) to have a consistent way of specifying how many bits they would > > like to be left free in the VA. This requires to take the next lowest > > address space to guaruntee that all of the most-significant bits left > > clear in hint address do not end up populated in the virtual address > > returned by mmap. > > > > - Charlie > > Hello Charlie, thank you for helping me understand! > > Ok, that does make sense now! The addr value hints "don't allocate > addr" > and thus: > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > Ok, but then > - addr > 2^57: mmap_end = 2^57 > right? > > I mean, probably STACK_TOP_MAX in non-compat mode means 2^57 already, but > having it explicitly like: > > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV57; \ > > would not be better for a future full 64-bit addressing? > (since it's already on a different if clause) I agree, that does make more sense. > > I could add comment on top of the macro with a short version on your addr > hint description above. Would that be ok? Sure :) - Charlie > > Thanks! > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > > like) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 5:42 ` Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 8:27 ` Leonardo Bras 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Charlie Jenkins Cc: Leonardo Bras, guoren, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:42:05PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 01:23:29AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:04:43PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:34:56AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > > > directly. > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > > > ({ \ > > > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > Now: > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > > > > > I agree, this change does not make sense for compat mode. Compat mode > > > should never return an address that is greater than 2^32, but this > > > change allows that. > > > > > > > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > Is the above correct? > > > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > > > That is not the case. I documented this behavior and reasoning in > > > Documentation/arch/riscv/vm-layout.rst in the "Userspace VAs" section. > > > > > > I can reiterate here though. The hint address to mmap (defined here as > > > "addr") is the maximum userspace address that mmap should provide. What > > > you are describing is a minimum. The purpose of this change was to allow > > > applications that are not compatible with a larger virtual address (such > > > as applications like Java that use the upper bits of the VA to store > > > data) to have a consistent way of specifying how many bits they would > > > like to be left free in the VA. This requires to take the next lowest > > > address space to guaruntee that all of the most-significant bits left > > > clear in hint address do not end up populated in the virtual address > > > returned by mmap. > > > > > > - Charlie > > > > Hello Charlie, thank you for helping me understand! > > > > Ok, that does make sense now! The addr value hints "don't allocate > addr" > > and thus: > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > Ok, but then > > - addr > 2^57: mmap_end = 2^57 > > right? > > > > I mean, probably STACK_TOP_MAX in non-compat mode means 2^57 already, but > > having it explicitly like: > > > > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV57; \ > > > > would not be better for a future full 64-bit addressing? > > (since it's already on a different if clause) > > I agree, that does make more sense. > > > > > I could add comment on top of the macro with a short version on your addr > > hint description above. Would that be ok? > > Sure :) Sent, thanks! Leo > > - Charlie > > > > > Thanks! > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > > > like) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 4:04 ` Charlie Jenkins 2023-12-22 4:23 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 4:36 ` Guo Ren 1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Charlie Jenkins Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:04 PM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:34:56AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > directly. > > > > ok > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > ({ \ > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > > Before: > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > Now: > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > I agree, this change does not make sense for compat mode. Compat mode > should never return an address that is greater than 2^32, but this > change allows that. #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE #define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) So, this change limits an address in 2^32 for compat mode, and your patch broke the rule. So that is why we need this patch to fix up. > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > Is the above correct? > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > That is not the case. I documented this behavior and reasoning in > Documentation/arch/riscv/vm-layout.rst in the "Userspace VAs" section. > > I can reiterate here though. The hint address to mmap (defined here as > "addr") is the maximum userspace address that mmap should provide. What > you are describing is a minimum. The purpose of this change was to allow > applications that are not compatible with a larger virtual address (such > as applications like Java that use the upper bits of the VA to store > data) to have a consistent way of specifying how many bits they would Yes, I agree with this change and use Zjpm with PLEN=48 to optimize them in the future. > like to be left free in the VA. This requires to take the next lowest > address space to guaruntee that all of the most-significant bits left > clear in hint address do not end up populated in the virtual address > returned by mmap. > > - Charlie > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > like) > > > > Thanks, > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 3:34 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 4:04 ` Charlie Jenkins @ 2023-12-22 4:26 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 4:43 ` Leonardo Bras 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:35 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > directly. > > ok > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > ({ \ > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. The above is just code simplification; if STACK_TOP_MAX is TASK_SIZE, then if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ is equal to: if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > Before: > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > Now: > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > Also, unrelated to the change: > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > Is the above correct? > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > Do I get it wrong? Maybe I should move this into the optimization part. > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > like) > > Thanks, > Leo > > > > > > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 4:26 ` Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 4:43 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 4:50 ` Guo Ren 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 4:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guo Ren Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:26:19PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:35 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > directly. > > > > ok > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > --- > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > ({ \ > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > The above is just code simplification; if STACK_TOP_MAX is TASK_SIZE, then > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > is equal to: > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ I am failing to understand exactly how are they equal. I mean, what in your STACK_TOP_MAX change made them equal? See below, the behavior changed: > > > > > Before: > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > Now: > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > ^ With your change on STACK_TOP_MAX only (not changing arch_get_mmap_end), you would have: - compat_mode & (0 < addr < 2^32) -> mmap_end = 2^32 - non-compat, addr == 0, or addr > 2^57 -> mmap_end = TASK_SIZE_64 - non-compat, (2^48 < addr < 2^57) -> mmap_end = 2^48 - non-compat, (0 < addr < 2^48) -> mmap_end = 2^39 Which seems more likely, based on Charlie comments. Thanks, Leo > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > Is the above correct? > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > Do I get it wrong? > Maybe I should move this into the optimization part. > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > like) > > > > Thanks, > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Guo Ren > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 4:43 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 4:50 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 5:27 ` Leonardo Bras 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:43 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:26:19PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:35 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > > directly. > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > --- > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > > ({ \ > > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > The above is just code simplification; if STACK_TOP_MAX is TASK_SIZE, then > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > is equal to: > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > I am failing to understand exactly how are they equal. > I mean, what in your STACK_TOP_MAX change made them equal? #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE #define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > See below, the behavior changed: > > > > > > > > Before: > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > Now: > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > > > > ^ > > With your change on STACK_TOP_MAX only (not changing arch_get_mmap_end), > you would have: > > - compat_mode & (0 < addr < 2^32) -> mmap_end = 2^32 compat_mode -> mmap_end = 2^32 > - non-compat, addr == 0, or addr > 2^57 -> mmap_end = TASK_SIZE_64 > - non-compat, (2^48 < addr < 2^57) -> mmap_end = 2^48 > - non-compat, (0 < addr < 2^48) -> mmap_end = 2^39 > > Which seems more likely, based on Charlie comments. > > Thanks, > Leo > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > Is the above correct? > > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > Maybe I should move this into the optimization part. > > > > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > > like) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Guo Ren > > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 4:50 ` Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 5:27 ` Leonardo Bras 2023-12-22 7:20 ` Guo Ren 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guo Ren Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:44PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:43 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:26:19PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:35 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > > > directly. > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > > > ({ \ > > > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > The above is just code simplification; if STACK_TOP_MAX is TASK_SIZE, then > > > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > is equal to: > > > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > I am failing to understand exactly how are they equal. > > I mean, what in your STACK_TOP_MAX change made them equal? > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > #define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > yes, I am aware. Let's do a simple test with the new code and addr = 2^27 (random 32-bit addr) and compat mode. if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) // Evaluates to false: 2^27 != 0, and is < 2^57 else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) // Evaluates to false: 2^27 < 2^48 else mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39; mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39, even in compat_mode. We need the extra is_compat_task() if we want to return 2^32. Thanks! Leo > > > > See below, the behavior changed: > > > > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > Now: > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > > > > > > > ^ > > > > With your change on STACK_TOP_MAX only (not changing arch_get_mmap_end), > > you would have: > > > > - compat_mode & (0 < addr < 2^32) -> mmap_end = 2^32 > compat_mode -> mmap_end = 2^32 > This is correct! Yeah, since you changed STACK_TOP_MAX to be 2^32 in compat mode, any addr value < 2^32 with compat value will return 2^32. (without the change in arch_get_mmap_end(), that is.) > > - non-compat, addr == 0, or addr > 2^57 -> mmap_end = TASK_SIZE_64 > > - non-compat, (2^48 < addr < 2^57) -> mmap_end = 2^48 > > - non-compat, (0 < addr < 2^48) -> mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > Which seems more likely, based on Charlie comments. > > > > Thanks, > > Leo > > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > Is the above correct? > > > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > Maybe I should move this into the optimization part. > > > > > > > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > > > like) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards > > > Guo Ren > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Guo Ren > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 5:27 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 7:20 ` Guo Ren 2023-12-22 7:49 ` Leonardo Bras 0 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leonardo Bras Cc: linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:28 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:44PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:43 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:26:19PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:35 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > > > > directly. > > > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > > > > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > > > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > > > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > > > > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > > > > ({ \ > > > > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > > The above is just code simplification; if STACK_TOP_MAX is TASK_SIZE, then > > > > > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > > > is equal to: > > > > > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > I am failing to understand exactly how are they equal. > > > I mean, what in your STACK_TOP_MAX change made them equal? > > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > #define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > > yes, I am aware. Let's do a simple test with the new code and > addr = 2^27 (random 32-bit addr) and compat mode. > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) > // Evaluates to false: 2^27 != 0, and is < 2^57 > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) > // Evaluates to false: 2^27 < 2^48 > else > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39; > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39, even in compat_mode. > > We need the extra is_compat_task() if we want to return 2^32. Yes, my stupid, I fell into the wrong logic. Sorry for the noisy part, which should be removed. > > Thanks! > Leo > > > > > > > > See below, the behavior changed: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > > > Now: > > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > > > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > > > > > > > > > > ^ > > > > > > With your change on STACK_TOP_MAX only (not changing arch_get_mmap_end), > > > you would have: > > > > > > - compat_mode & (0 < addr < 2^32) -> mmap_end = 2^32 > > compat_mode -> mmap_end = 2^32 > > > > This is correct! > Yeah, since you changed STACK_TOP_MAX to be 2^32 in compat mode, > any addr value < 2^32 with compat value will return 2^32. > (without the change in arch_get_mmap_end(), that is.) > > > > - non-compat, addr == 0, or addr > 2^57 -> mmap_end = TASK_SIZE_64 > > > - non-compat, (2^48 < addr < 2^57) -> mmap_end = 2^48 > > > - non-compat, (0 < addr < 2^48) -> mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > Which seems more likely, based on Charlie comments. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Leo > > > > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > > Is the above correct? > > > > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > > > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > > > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > > Maybe I should move this into the optimization part. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > > > > like) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards > > > > Guo Ren > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Guo Ren > > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 7:20 ` Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 7:49 ` Leonardo Bras 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guo Ren Cc: Leonardo Bras, linux-kernel, paul.walmsley, palmer, alexghiti, charlie, xiao.w.wang, david, panqinglin2020, rick.p.edgecombe, willy, bjorn, conor.dooley, cleger, linux-riscv, Guo Ren, stable On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 03:20:15PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 1:28 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:50:44PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:43 PM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:26:19PM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 11:35 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46:59AM -0500, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > > > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > > > > > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > > > > > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > > > > > > directly. > > > > > > > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > Fixes: add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 6 ++---- > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > > > index f19f861cda54..1f538fc4448d 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h > > > > > > > @@ -16,15 +16,13 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > > > > > > > #define DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW (UL(1) << (MMAP_VA_BITS - 1)) > > > > > > > -#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > > > > +#define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > > > > > > > > > > It means STACK_TOP_MAX will be in 64BIT: > > > > > > - TASK_SIZE_32 if compat_mode=y > > > > > > - TASK_SIZE_64 if compat_mode=n > > > > > > > > > > > > Makes sense for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #define arch_get_mmap_end(addr, len, flags) \ > > > > > > > ({ \ > > > > > > > unsigned long mmap_end; \ > > > > > > > typeof(addr) _addr = (addr); \ > > > > > > > - if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > > > > - mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > > > - else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > > + if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) \ > > > > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV48; \ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I got this change, or how it's connected to the commit msg. > > > > > The above is just code simplification; if STACK_TOP_MAX is TASK_SIZE, then > > > > > > > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && is_compat_task())) \ > > > > > mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX; \ > > > > > else if ((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > > > > > is equal to: > > > > > > > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) \ > > > > > > > > I am failing to understand exactly how are they equal. > > > > I mean, what in your STACK_TOP_MAX change made them equal? > > > #define STACK_TOP_MAX TASK_SIZE > > > #define TASK_SIZE (is_compat_task() ? TASK_SIZE_32 : TASK_SIZE_64) > > > > > > > yes, I am aware. Let's do a simple test with the new code and > > addr = 2^27 (random 32-bit addr) and compat mode. > > > > if ((_addr) == 0 || (_addr) >= VA_USER_SV57) > > // Evaluates to false: 2^27 != 0, and is < 2^57 > > else if ((((_addr) >= VA_USER_SV48)) && (VA_BITS >= VA_BITS_SV48)) > > // Evaluates to false: 2^27 < 2^48 > > else > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39; > > > > mmap_end = VA_USER_SV39, even in compat_mode. > > > > We need the extra is_compat_task() if we want to return 2^32. > Yes, my stupid, I fell into the wrong logic. Sorry for the noisy part, > which should be removed. Don't worry, I also do stuff like this when I am too focused in the issue :) Thanks! Leo > > > > > Thanks! > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > See below, the behavior changed: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57, or compat: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > > > > > Now: > > > > > > - addr == 0, or addr > 2^57: mmap_end = STACK_TOP_MAX > > > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > > > - 0 < addr < 2^48 : mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > > > > > IIUC compat mode addr will be < 2^32, so will always have mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > if addr != 0. Is that desireable? > > > > > > (if not, above change is unneeded) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ^ > > > > > > > > With your change on STACK_TOP_MAX only (not changing arch_get_mmap_end), > > > > you would have: > > > > > > > > - compat_mode & (0 < addr < 2^32) -> mmap_end = 2^32 > > > compat_mode -> mmap_end = 2^32 > > > > > > > This is correct! > > Yeah, since you changed STACK_TOP_MAX to be 2^32 in compat mode, > > any addr value < 2^32 with compat value will return 2^32. > > (without the change in arch_get_mmap_end(), that is.) > > > > > > - non-compat, addr == 0, or addr > 2^57 -> mmap_end = TASK_SIZE_64 > > > > - non-compat, (2^48 < addr < 2^57) -> mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > - non-compat, (0 < addr < 2^48) -> mmap_end = 2^39 > > > > > > > > Which seems more likely, based on Charlie comments. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > Also, unrelated to the change: > > > > > > - 2^48 < addr < 2^57: mmap_end = 2^48 > > > > > > Is the above correct? > > > > > > It looks like it should be 2^57 instead, and a new if clause for > > > > > > 2^32 < addr < 2^48 should have mmap_end = 2^48. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do I get it wrong? > > > > > Maybe I should move this into the optimization part. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (I will send an RFC 'fixing' the code the way I am whinking it should look > > > > > > like) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > Guo Ren > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards > > > Guo Ren > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Guo Ren > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end guoren 2023-12-22 3:34 ` Leonardo Bras @ 2023-12-22 8:59 ` David Laight 2023-12-22 9:33 ` Guo Ren 1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread From: David Laight @ 2023-12-22 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'guoren@kernel.org', linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, david@redhat.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, willy@infradead.org, bjorn@rivosinc.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, leobras@redhat.com Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Guo Ren, stable@vger.kernel.org From: guoren@kernel.org <guoren@kernel.org> > Sent: 21 December 2023 15:47 > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > directly. Why 2G ? IIRC for 32-bit native x86 the limit is 3G, but in compat mode it is (just under) 4G. There is a special mmap option (for programs like wine) to limit mmap() to 2G. David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end 2023-12-22 8:59 ` David Laight @ 2023-12-22 9:33 ` Guo Ren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread From: Guo Ren @ 2023-12-22 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Laight Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, david@redhat.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, willy@infradead.org, bjorn@rivosinc.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, leobras@redhat.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Guo Ren, stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 5:00 PM David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote: > > From: guoren@kernel.org <guoren@kernel.org> > > Sent: 21 December 2023 15:47 > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > When the task is in COMPAT mode, the arch_get_mmap_end should be 2GB, > > not TASK_SIZE_64. The TASK_SIZE has contained is_compat_mode() > > detection, so change the definition of STACK_TOP_MAX to TASK_SIZE > > directly. > > Why 2G ? > > IIRC for 32-bit native x86 the limit is 3G, but in compat mode > it is (just under) 4G. > > There is a special mmap option (for programs like wine) to > limit mmap() to 2G. The 2G address space seems enough for a small memory scenario, and I agree the compat mode could support 4G, but it should be another feature. We limited our rv32 applications to under 2GB because we want to leave more address space for the kernel side (Our s64ilp32 kernel needs vmmap stack, kasan ...). > > David > > - > Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK > Registration No: 1397386 (Wales) > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-22 10:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20231221154702.2267684-1-guoren@kernel.org>
2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat mode boot failure guoren
2023-12-22 1:51 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 2:57 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-22 3:50 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-12-22 4:32 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 7:33 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-22 10:58 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-21 15:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] riscv: mm: Fixup compat arch_get_mmap_end guoren
2023-12-22 3:34 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 4:04 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-12-22 4:23 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 5:42 ` Charlie Jenkins
2023-12-22 8:27 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 4:36 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-22 4:26 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-22 4:43 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 4:50 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-22 5:27 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 7:20 ` Guo Ren
2023-12-22 7:49 ` Leonardo Bras
2023-12-22 8:59 ` David Laight
2023-12-22 9:33 ` Guo Ren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox