From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8137B7483; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.121.71.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710400213; cv=none; b=Gdo0xQDWrN3pZHFBpDXUs30Z9mUftuo5wMoq4TBiglx7jWHi7T4fpQ/bdP/fkvOy0O1kZfouHw7aDyUsAdBE2cNOTLDkIOxwEA0x6AGDtuGA818EORNlH2enGpNffrcOAs7hyHT2KO5d+3Vr640U2VJQRebSgUcb0B3GCZrtqpo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710400213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jY6yOpE8g9BQVfVV2ZkfIkx2zon2uXer6mzsjaixt0U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ObOhG8Dva6ug31qHDjzMSDO/W09F1tC+msK/3SO9kSLF3CmV6U/AX/jlQ6i8GIuSpaxJkxav56jIWqsBswozu9sRh14R6iXJZjD0I928iaOPdl6S9G7ZBG3Sl3HbAZv+VUS4HTdBD/WZH0SA2meaR+YDmWo32FeVr7s4Mz8z0GI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=SPGjn6pM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=ZSt6A1RC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.121.71.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="SPGjn6pM"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="ZSt6A1RC" Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id 208BFC01E; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:03:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1710399829; bh=3Vv06S8OE0qnROsAgEOpxSNvRHaMC9janhFTWckPh+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SPGjn6pMlC0hxjnvWiFi4yuaD+Me9YRaiEjz9yKlZpGf5xIY3UFHv9HuIxHvn2lRV O2EA/W3iOn0PCeRJM1QDD84hyagGsbkMQnwKZdzr2KCYPIj7ckxn+02hxXk9cjSJuU edujCM9iKpybgSYt0vtWd/LN3j+98Wyalxr7FINaGM/eIwZchvTbiBnzFoCEkKB+MA gpbHyodFgjgK/jXcX+lPVj6xwmeJqO87MXrNLXlYrX41dRAiRWbQgwZ+yuUjnVYlq0 pRjwTZ8fcgMuF+7UzkV7RJI93miUCA/my7PTjYJ9M50L8Il3060HFybfJGQMFTmqSm 6mOHSuZ1obGeQ== X-Spam-Level: Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BE3C009; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:03:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1710399828; bh=3Vv06S8OE0qnROsAgEOpxSNvRHaMC9janhFTWckPh+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZSt6A1RCFK9P6wi6S9jOhVJeqevRv7Q17lI9WJe8YB+JRF5p8Xgt13VR0Xc9lyIjo gTmHSwNLtYDoBNDzXg6Npv2A08heBSgw8XaZsnqOjBJ/CikiBHdKFRBuN+IuY28RLD gLb7co1SKnonFEL0mI9DUNQ/7CwcMC+BKJksVhRPvaiFLAljHF6VaaihN2qd/ZDwIZ ot9ffnxkrtzPl6IaxPAP+EJ1o8sDX3DzADndMapZQrZ4BMN4tocYJnr5oPdtZWiEcS EwvE6WWWCWe8Wz8rmA6uUIUKOUPSzAmkRZx/qaCfeni/m/aVx8gNNH86abLvgjTgtg F7YY4NYonuXYg== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id a2e2f42c; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 07:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:03:25 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Sasha Levin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/73] 5.10.213-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20240313164640.616049-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240313164640.616049-1-sashal@kernel.org> Sasha Levin wrote on Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:45:27PM -0400: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.213 release. > There are 73 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Thanks Sasha for submitting a stable rc review! If it's not too much trouble, would it be possible to have a different header in the 00 patch from the other patches for my mailbox? The mails Greg sends have the X-KernelTest-* headers (patch, tree, branch etc) only in the cover letter, while all the patches themselves only have 'X-stable: review' and 'X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore' I don't really care much what actual tags are on which as long as there's a way to differentiate that cover letter from the rest so I can redirect it to a mailbox I actually read to notice there's a new rc to test, without having all the patches unless I explicitly look for them. If it's difficult I'll add a regex on the subject for ' 00/' or something, I'd prefer matching only headers for robustness but just let me know. Didn't run into any problem with the patches themselves: > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-5.10.y&id2=v5.10.212 > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Tested 0a70dd1e1aa9 ("Linux 5.10.213-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus