From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C8913AD8 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710582079; cv=none; b=WpMPibyj38OlclU0RDFkQBxYHhOgzn5SwguokQQMYete4Pqk2vO+bFnaUX0E2ryMD/v2pLBtrJTfpQRujiSxTo4EoFq7PRzpGUldKIZRsawGfLXjTIC2E5Q2+XUVokUfQ2CW45GRC5tuwrJUuL6EC3AAs+4xkGRKMvGm5QH8UZ4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710582079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LSvVYtDp3EgrkiyYQsdXi4PViDzACrLcEUJTgaBQsfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZV0l0pdP6OB8dQ0gquj/Tb/3LrT6x1accTqbIsbF242ekswdDVdpYKJxZctOP7dCwP4BHZwApQTxUCRdOgOpynczhw2mOkLZ7AcXCtKfxUd00mcWu/gNkgvWnJuDInXkDW+HSc/tfyFF8j6laExX9nAhbhN0RTrCn8eFaFnJ4xc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PqH8IaQr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PqH8IaQr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 763DAC433C7; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:41:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1710582078; bh=LSvVYtDp3EgrkiyYQsdXi4PViDzACrLcEUJTgaBQsfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PqH8IaQr6nDsV3QaMQeEBLmEDCc69CNr2Nv4u/8Zcr08oCnhHz9HLuosygNLLsAtR RejiOS68scbcxrPCh1fCMCaKbo2dYpfL71L5vnYhX0B4o+weurWjGMmMFyNR3oTm3P b0yq4yylZIxBks9PeNfnxHx8e19oKPm+6tSMcj9/IyO3nxWKP6fIe+T1kb6D2GW6F0 Ug/bzsTYRnd90mrXdqIjuaZm5nMmr7yQR37XEO/YC86C9fm7hQDW37vHMrbY/l1w3V iUycKPoWW/QZUbTYJstL0eIZGudUMILrpFnFmwikUwRN1d8KbEfbgzXyWNObzF7wno UvjAML+UvJLaw== Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:41:16 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , kernel-dev@igalia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 0/5] Support static calls with LLVM-built kernels Message-ID: References: <20240313104255.1083365-1-cascardo@igalia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240313104255.1083365-1-cascardo@igalia.com> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 07:42:50AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: >Peter Zijlstra (4): > arch: Introduce CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT > x86/alternatives: Introduce int3_emulate_jcc() > x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to patch Jcc.d32 instructions > x86/static_call: Add support for Jcc tail-calls > >Thomas Gleixner (1): > x86/asm: Differentiate between code and function alignment Is this not an issue on 6.1? I don't see d49a0626216b ("arch: Introduce CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT") in that tree. -- Thanks, Sasha