From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270CC4CE09; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711366490; cv=none; b=iiIqzBVlRf+ayc14PD6JnD7iOLQ5RvufPA5MpAMdIkBOEWK9+h5RSJqFe/rpVLY/95pdXoEygpCq+Ggzfzf8nCpk0ElgrhPrAzW4jTIZDTEmzed6cMwkL10T5McZA9eBIVBpcnpErkY55y7nvgzga8Y8heyxi1MNyUvP0YcawSg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711366490; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u4R1p+rS+1S1wwSKjEvVMR8WPglN/O5MSJm1Qqv7w94=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KtW5S5IRgNOpyahYkVWHUl9mhymsuv5qGpKQEImADRbzQ5HqO8g1RgI+xb2wrTifSQO9JuKoZ2OHUFTQD6jKtzLS/WzPpQX958Z+mYduw1S0erpyutdwYwVtUZcqir8YHVmx6/r1mEez2EuZqqoetKOFNVKdz1pgjERwAdubpdA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=M46Y3cLU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="M46Y3cLU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E562C433F1; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:34:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1711366489; bh=u4R1p+rS+1S1wwSKjEvVMR8WPglN/O5MSJm1Qqv7w94=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M46Y3cLUhPb0+7faDczUcfGtsze+3D5Rxy2OzF2nkFhQNvVN0d1pUi/wDwlExd5EC v4CazADNswPqsHuVKJ+meFfp37anWmPGs3Gqw0hgZ5b4mTDp/54tKjw/WHVK3asY3p 8NyYW17JlGHkF+v2meQyqnbDZye7SKbly/2puJ8pJbOVQ9Fwyth4JkEkxHp4eLvom0 k5drqZfb7xPVYSEbM99QHvauaGDuda+jZqe+zCdqgU9d8ipCYGG3AM7njenoAyZHp+ rjblSDYC+6KMDd6lsD82MCavGU4pGtrfIpjF43DTg83u6H4zZrJdt3FMnp5B+ritMr Qz3OfiGWJHJNg== Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:34:48 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, pavel@denx.de, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Nicolin Chen , Jason Gunthorpe , Will Deacon , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/638] 6.6.23-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20240324230116.1348576-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:28:01PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 04:31, Sasha Levin wrote: >> >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.23 release. >> There are 638 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Tue Mar 26 11:01:10 PM UTC 2024. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/patch/?id=linux-6.6.y&id2=v6.6.22 >> or in the git tree and branch at: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> >> Thanks, >> Sasha > > >The regression detected while building allmodconfig builds with clang-17 >failed on all the architectures. > >> Andrii Nakryiko (3): >> libbpf: Fix faccessat() usage on Android >> libbpf: Add missing LIBBPF_API annotation to libbpf_set_memlock_rlim >> API >> bpf: don't infer PTR_TO_CTX for programs with unnamed context type > >arm64 gcc-13 - FAILED (other architectures passed) >arm64 clang-17 - FAILED (All other architectures failed)) > >The 2 errors are only noticed on arm64. > >> Jason Gunthorpe (1): >> iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Check that the RID domain is S1 in SVA > >Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing > >Build error: >------------ >kernel/bpf/btf.c:5660:10: error: expression which evaluates to zero >treated as a null pointer constant of type 'const struct btf_member *' >[-Werror,-Wnon-literal-null-conversion] > 5660 | return false; > | ^~~~~ >1 error generated. > > > >drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c:358:10: error: >incompatible integer to pointer conversion returning 'int' from a >function with result type 'struct iommu_sva *' [-Wint-conversion] > 358 | return -ENODEV; > | ^~~~~~~ >drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c:361:10: error: >incompatible integer to pointer conversion returning 'int' from a >function with result type 'struct iommu_sva *' [-Wint-conversion] > 361 | return -ENODEV; > | ^~~~~~~ >2 errors generated. Thanks for the report! I've dropped the two offending commits. -- Thanks, Sasha