public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Abdel Alkuor <abdelalkuor@geotab.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:29:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZgveG5Ly3mw0O0eo@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328-tps6598x_fix_event_handling-v1-2-502721ff705b@wolfvision.net>

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:55:52PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The current interrupt service routine of the tps6598x only reads the
> first 64 bits of the INT_EVENT1 and INT_EVENT2 registers, which means
> that any event above that range will be ignored, leaving interrupts
> unattended. Moreover, those events will not be cleared, and the device
> will keep the interrupt enabled.
> 
> This issue has been observed while attempting to load patches, and the
> 'ReadyForPatch' field (bit 81) of INT_EVENT1 was set.
> 
> Read the complete INT_EVENT registers to handle all interrupts generated
> by the device in a similar fashion to what is already done for the
> tps25750.
> 
> Fixes: 0a4c005bd171 ("usb: typec: driver for TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controllers")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> index 7c2f01344860..308748d6cae6 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c
> @@ -637,48 +637,53 @@ static irqreturn_t tps25750_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
>  static irqreturn_t tps6598x_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct tps6598x *tps = data;
> -	u64 event1 = 0;
> -	u64 event2 = 0;
> +	u64 event1[2] = { };
> +	u64 event2[2] = { };
>  	u32 status;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tps->lock);
>  
> -	ret = tps6598x_read64(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT1, &event1);
> -	ret |= tps6598x_read64(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT2, &event2);
> +	ret = tps6598x_block_read(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT1, event1, 11);

This is not going to work with the older TI PD controllers.

The lenght of these registers is 8 bytes on the older TI PD
controllers (TPS65981, TPS65982, etc.). I think we need to split this
function.

>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(tps->dev, "%s: failed to read events\n", __func__);
> +		dev_err(tps->dev, "%s: failed to read event1\n", __func__);
>  		goto err_unlock;
>  	}
> -	trace_tps6598x_irq(event1, event2);
> +	ret = tps6598x_block_read(tps, TPS_REG_INT_EVENT2, event2, 11);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(tps->dev, "%s: failed to read event2\n", __func__);
> +		goto err_unlock;
> +	}
> +	trace_tps6598x_irq(event1[0], event2[0]);
>  
> -	if (!(event1 | event2))
> +	if (!(event1[0] | event1[1] | event2[0] | event2[1]))
>  		goto err_unlock;
>  
>  	if (!tps6598x_read_status(tps, &status))
>  		goto err_clear_ints;
>  
> -	if ((event1 | event2) & TPS_REG_INT_POWER_STATUS_UPDATE)
> +	if ((event1[0] | event2[0]) & TPS_REG_INT_POWER_STATUS_UPDATE)
>  		if (!tps6598x_read_power_status(tps))
>  			goto err_clear_ints;
>  
> -	if ((event1 | event2) & TPS_REG_INT_DATA_STATUS_UPDATE)
> +	if ((event1[0] | event2[0]) & TPS_REG_INT_DATA_STATUS_UPDATE)
>  		if (!tps6598x_read_data_status(tps))
>  			goto err_clear_ints;
>  
>  	/* Handle plug insert or removal */
> -	if ((event1 | event2) & TPS_REG_INT_PLUG_EVENT)
> +	if ((event1[0] | event2[0]) & TPS_REG_INT_PLUG_EVENT)
>  		tps6598x_handle_plug_event(tps, status);
>  
>  err_clear_ints:
> -	tps6598x_write64(tps, TPS_REG_INT_CLEAR1, event1);
> -	tps6598x_write64(tps, TPS_REG_INT_CLEAR2, event2);
> +	tps6598x_block_write(tps, TPS_REG_INT_CLEAR1, event1, 11);
> +	tps6598x_block_write(tps, TPS_REG_INT_CLEAR2, event2, 11);
>  
>  err_unlock:
>  	mutex_unlock(&tps->lock);
>  
> -	if (event1 | event2)
> +	if (event1[0] | event1[1] | event2[0] | event2[1])
>  		return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
>  	return IRQ_NONE;
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.40.1

-- 
heikki

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-02 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-28 16:55 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking in interrupt service routines Javier Carrasco
2024-03-28 16:55 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps25750 Javier Carrasco
2024-04-02 10:21   ` Heikki Krogerus
2024-03-28 16:55 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x Javier Carrasco
2024-04-02 10:29   ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2024-04-03  8:55     ` Javier Carrasco
2024-04-05  6:49       ` Heikki Krogerus
2024-04-11 20:13         ` Javier Carrasco
2024-04-02 10:21 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking in interrupt service routines Heikki Krogerus
2024-04-02 17:39   ` Javier Carrasco
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-28 16:25 Javier Carrasco
2024-03-28 16:25 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x Javier Carrasco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZgveG5Ly3mw0O0eo@kuha.fi.intel.com \
    --to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=abdelalkuor@geotab.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox