From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Михаил Новоселов" <m.novosyolov@rosalinux.ru>
Cc: riel@surriel.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
sashal@kernel.org, "Бетхер Александр" <a.betkher@rosalinux.ru>,
"i gaptrakhmanov" <i.gaptrakhmanov@rosalinux.ru>
Subject: Re: Serious regression on 6.1.x-stable caused by "bounds: support non-power-of-two CONFIG_NR_CPUS"
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:17:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zi-P2rrWZTlrpi3B@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <134159708.2271149.1714363659210.JavaMail.zimbra@rosalinux.ru>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 07:07:39AM +0300, Михаил Новоселов wrote:
> >> It was backported to 6.1.84, 6.1.84 has problems, 6/1/83 does not, the newest
> >> 6.1.88 still has this problem.
> >
> > Does v6.8.3 (which contains cf778fff03be) have this problem?
> > How about current Linus master?
>
> 6.1.88 - has problem
> 6.6.27 - does not have problem
> 6.9-rc from commit efdfbbc4dcc8f98754056971f88af0f7ff906144 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git - does not have problem
>
> 6.8.3 was not tested, but we can test it if needed.
How curious.
> > What kernel config were you using? I don't see that info on
> > https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=9c92ac1222
> > (maybe my tired eyes can't see it)
>
> Kernel config for 6.1: https://abf.io/import/kernel-6.1/blob/bcb3e9611f/kernel-x86_64.config
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8192
> For 6.6: https://abf.io/import/kernel-6.6/blob/7404a4d3d5/kernel-x86_64.config
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8192
Since you're using a power-of-two, this should have been a no-op.
But bits_per() doesn't work the way I thought it did!
#define bits_per(n) \
( \
__builtin_constant_p(n) ? ( \
((n) == 0 || (n) == 1) \
? 1 : ilog2(n) + 1 \
) : \
CONFIG_NR_CPUS is obviously a constant, and larger than 1, so we end up
calling ilog2(n) + 1. So we allocate one extra bit.
I should have changed this to
DEFINE(NR_CPUS_BITS, bits_per(CONFIG_NR_CPUS - 1))
Can you test that and report back? I'll prepare a fix for mainline in
the meantime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-28 14:58 Serious regression on 6.1.x-stable caused by "bounds: support non-power-of-two CONFIG_NR_CPUS" Mikhail Novosyolov
2024-04-29 2:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-29 4:07 ` Михаил Новоселов
2024-04-29 12:17 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2024-04-29 13:37 ` Ильфат Гаптрахманов
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zi-P2rrWZTlrpi3B@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=a.betkher@rosalinux.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=i.gaptrakhmanov@rosalinux.ru \
--cc=m.novosyolov@rosalinux.ru \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox