From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7CCF19AD7B; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719518107; cv=none; b=BQFF7y2Mml19SxtFw/+rZ2YdZPsZqBoNw2rGIGtld/E7ozPDxftPNKHrDg79Iuxrhu0aa6Xk8bu7YUQyXeHYcn6cl5A6XgjNlelM/5q55QHbUN4GnB3semKibL9iJqQ9qWi/7buXfsjxm5xiS7OPtEy6ynfKxvErhfIc/N9u3zY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719518107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hrwvdZWx7IhA0lYFaP6GXEUdbYOx3ORsC1ADYxitptk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fwLKq3Mskfe8StUYM6jCH7mYqDQ7huDZIcmN/4DDboEGMIqePDCBub5yPe4mey/PRKnSnNd74Ttc/vvSHWfzBYn0L5KLRXn9zG7iWotB2FZnnPRTi0FkFxKNr6xP0/tKYYxC+weAa8qtgQePsMqGKqlI+8pkaoK4DO69QyDNz+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oAf8fG48; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oAf8fG48" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 254EFC2BBFC; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:55:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719518106; bh=hrwvdZWx7IhA0lYFaP6GXEUdbYOx3ORsC1ADYxitptk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oAf8fG4881G0CMiCpfCf0ZzzHM0S5m62lU1dsUVHM8HSkhUGqa/yITbyztb2/iiqI pRJf9v6Tw+rEgWLOjj49zXX6hcCg4FbZByfJDO2NLGmsv0bACSktUhQMod2/ap+ttc zYy+WJmgmF9SzAF8nVjTV2ho+muSDv640t4vGhRvjm534hpB0e7uSkQ0IvdqfUqbVF BdP1S2SlgwHUE+Hp5gQsEm+q2fL3oMEkEflRrZMb68SEigO/JMKtZig0YTDsitgyCt vF8mimpxyq4MUTpidgyxco61Tvtlc4b+ie9Yr7yuCTGTL2xj2y9KwkzxuERz7xNH+1 qWvAClKVXh9Hg== Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:55:04 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Mike Rapoport Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Patch "mm: memblock: replace dereferences of memblock_region.nid with API calls" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree Message-ID: References: <20240626190708.2059584-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 05:40:12PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:12:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:13:00AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >> > Hi Sasha, >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 03:07:08PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled >> > > >> > > mm: memblock: replace dereferences of memblock_region.nid with API calls >> > > >> > > to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at: >> > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary >> > > >> > > The filename of the patch is: >> > > mm-memblock-replace-dereferences-of-memblock_region..patch >> > > and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory. >> > > >> > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, >> > > please let know about it. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > commit dd8d9169375a725cadd5e3635342a6e2d483cf4c >> > > Author: Mike Rapoport >> > > Date: Wed Jun 3 15:56:53 2020 -0700 >> > > >> > > mm: memblock: replace dereferences of memblock_region.nid with API calls >> > > >> > > Stable-dep-of: 3ac36aa73073 ("x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node()") >> > >> > The commit 3ac36aa73073 shouldn't be backported to 5.4 or anything before >> > 6.8 for that matter, I don't see a need to bring this in as well. >> >> Sadly there was no fixes tag :( >> >> Should this be reverted from 5.4 and older, or is it ok for it to be >> there? > >It should be reverted from 5.4 and earlier please Ack -- Thanks, Sasha