From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from submarine.notk.org (62-210-214-84.rev.poneytelecom.eu [62.210.214.84]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9141271743; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718787924; cv=none; b=fkkg1LgR25pqr+oiXFTZckBGL6+0EbMgk6xoVvVm2Q1QfSFe9+Tolab+MX7eMB1CJaQDf6UlaRlE/8uSV8xLubS12lYgYAlZvizEFsu6KDEjByE9O2zA7ghvPDM8FMBhCMg40WOFILn6WTfZRJKFjCvDMlRS16FIcjfRPln7MSE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718787924; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7cuqbtTO2T0xC2U3DuHtcBcLZQ67OxZjdSsIQFlgjkQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gKf5Ot4d2dMGRedZrkdXQK60XO9XP1sBgVK11rTCdfNL5b+9g9Rxf1jvSdahA5vKk5sLeFGEQJPTL30bXW3JQUlzQ51DMdGu1tpgGsBCBHn4HSOgkJUt5qrWLwUB5LUfr5XLPdsf3+1w5BBHrIkdih9iyuF1+RYUkQdJUS2EqGg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b=RzS3pVpY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.210.214.84 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=codewreck.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=codewreck.org header.i=@codewreck.org header.b="RzS3pVpY" Received: from gaia.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submarine.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D708114C1E1; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:05:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1718787912; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=le7+/07s5UJcLTEq6XBfMrFrXj/eObiEjeEWlhza6BU=; b=RzS3pVpYJ25rJpX7bJttqkAKIYoA0djgl5FhrbdhJhkKB7vBdmW+J/TYY7YvrLlMq/XM5F TcORMS9cYRgmpfHjevaVi05BWuHrAWVsLnV7RV0mSP+A6TTgytrk3APcdiOnAFzq2m0YCN 6u3vZFBhpSJL94TjxcZhftP1SlSdKoKxQfv+D6e1h3Ayi8T8HyB0vwF3ry3fr4Qx+QyAVj xGCD+0rmTo/D1MNSL2LIn0QmEF0cJxOf5OyuNeF6ShwP9fOfyEnguW6s8ngSHQ5mgu8kB/ eEd3oFHlaOxMGBDexFd2/VJMsT4s4yef/2jrJlmWKrbphJgIAkRlOrK2vlWK5w== Received: from localhost (gaia.codewreck.org [local]) by gaia.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 8da32b40; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 18:04:46 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20240618123407.280171066@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240618123407.280171066@linuxfoundation.org> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 02:27:33PM +0200: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.220 release. > There are 770 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:32:00 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.220-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. (that's a lot of NFS/FS patches... I normally don't test NFS, but given the content of this cycle I tested very basic client/server code by exporting something mounting it and reading/writing to a file, so at least it's not exploding immediately) Tested 7927147b02fc ("Linux 5.10.220-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus