stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: "Gote, Nitin R" <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>,
	"Wilson, Chris P" <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
	"tursulin@ursulin.net" <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Shyti, Andi" <andi.shyti@intel.com>,
	"Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
	"janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com"
	<janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gt: Do not consider preemption during execlists_dequeue for gen8
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:09:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpAfyzKlqlMrd4nj@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB54443CBE8B4A052419FFFD1BE5A52@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 04:28:53PM +0000, Cavitt, Jonathan wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Nitin Gote
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 9:32 AM
> To: Wilson, Chris P <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>; tursulin@ursulin.net; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Shyti, Andi <andi.shyti@intel.com>; Das, Nirmoy <nirmoy.das@intel.com>; janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com; Gote, Nitin R <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>; Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>; stable@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gt: Do not consider preemption during execlists_dequeue for gen8
> > 
> > We're seeing a GPU HANG issue on a CHV platform, which was caused by
> > bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for gen8").
> > 
> > Gen8 platform has only timeslice and doesn't support a preemption mechanism
> > as engines do not have a preemption timer and doesn't send an irq if the
> > preemption timeout expires.
> 
> That seems to mean the original can_preempt function was inaccurately built,
> so fixing it here makes the most sense to me, especially if it's causing problems.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> -Jonathan Cavitt
> 
> > So, add a fix to not consider preemption
> > during dequeuing for gen8 platforms.
> > 
> > v2: Simplify can_preempt() function (Tvrtko Ursulin)
> > 
> > v3:
> >  - Inside need_preempt(), condition of can_preempt() is not required
> >    as simplified can_preempt() is enough. (Chris Wilson)
> > 
> > Fixes: bac24f59f454 ("drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for gen8")

Something strange in here...

This patch is not using directly or indirectly (I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION) the
can_preempt()...

> > Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/11396
> > Suggested-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>
> > CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 6 +-----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> > index 21829439e686..72090f52fb85 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> > @@ -3315,11 +3315,7 @@ static void remove_from_engine(struct i915_request *rq)
> >  
> >  static bool can_preempt(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >  {
> > -	if (GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) > 8)
> > -		return true;
> > -
> > -	/* GPGPU on bdw requires extra w/a; not implemented */
> > -	return engine->class != RENDER_CLASS;
> > +	return GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) > 8;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void kick_execlists(const struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-11 16:32 [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gt: Do not consider preemption during execlists_dequeue for gen8 Nitin Gote
2024-07-11 16:28 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-07-11 18:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-07-12 13:25     ` Gote, Nitin R
2024-07-12 13:39       ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-15 22:14       ` Andi Shyti
2024-07-16  3:43         ` Gote, Nitin R
2024-07-16  9:54 ` Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZpAfyzKlqlMrd4nj@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
    --cc=nitin.r.gote@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).