From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9148418A6B3 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723122101; cv=none; b=i+iq1Wfhk+zwfWReLKpTfdfCZwjSfT5cx+yzOdTEHwcq+g7Jm+xRt61cB+jqI1bFolX3GiVEc3GDFa8FI0f8jPM5KWBs3edJESbV4s70TIDY9KeNrv+k2nNp5HeCK7DZyLM6nJhYHdnsOXDNulrTAXwOkEkPMxhNd0wg1rDp4js= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723122101; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WJy6riYAQprnZmd05jyphtNgpH79mGG9qZWdFFY2/ZQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=M9jdKLH4qO01QJKuiblISM1HdgML+/7wKlZaMw3MY3vX1ApeAEhkjGsvNI+2v8jGfuHtUTly4C1ZKYu8W9EEU+uA/2Wkt7sb+WCHgoFh9/StA+J0sjEHQfWeLEf0yAHCdwbH62QeIqnTqM+/bqqBhqwSiDQDO/JhR9udjpCCHX8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=GVYWyKfk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="GVYWyKfk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1723122097; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+3VVVcICw5YU8pAW4Og/Up208pv4Neli8fjInWAkHzw=; b=GVYWyKfk1ShVPA0I5CfVWOFnubfGHeW9XVMvfMa1L4hI9GYjFw7/7mWNFo/Qxk2vzWNjqP 5X8f8hYiA0sA8DDMMf5MWiD1tZwY2bY+aXzHwWtKB195v5dlPP1lSimRiORQ5SEhmItE+C +dGqWIStXxfO0f6//vQqqOAA5VJ5yls= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-332-GwE64XWmM2KMGDVLNsI64g-1; Thu, 08 Aug 2024 09:01:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GwE64XWmM2KMGDVLNsI64g-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160401955F4B; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.72.112.129]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3CA3300018D; Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 21:01:25 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Hailong Liu Cc: Andrew Morton , Uladzislau Rezki , Christoph Hellwig , Vlastimil Babka , Michal Hocko , Tangquan Zheng , stable@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] mm/vmalloc: fix page mapping if vm_area_alloc_pages() with high order fallback to order 0 Message-ID: References: <20240808122019.3361-1-hailong.liu@oppo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240808122019.3361-1-hailong.liu@oppo.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 On 08/08/24 at 08:19pm, Hailong Liu wrote: > The __vmap_pages_range_noflush() assumes its argument pages** contains > pages with the same page shift. However, since commit e9c3cda4d86e > ("mm, vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations"), if gfp_flags > includes __GFP_NOFAIL with high order in vm_area_alloc_pages() > and page allocation failed for high order, the pages** may contain > two different page shifts (high order and order-0). This could > lead __vmap_pages_range_noflush() to perform incorrect mappings, > potentially resulting in memory corruption. > > Users might encounter this as follows (vmap_allow_huge = true, 2M is for PMD_SIZE): > kvmalloc(2M, __GFP_NOFAIL|GFP_X) > __vmalloc_node_range_noprof(vm_flags=VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) > vm_area_alloc_pages(order=9) ---> order-9 allocation failed and fallback to order-0 > vmap_pages_range() > vmap_pages_range_noflush() > __vmap_pages_range_noflush(page_shift = 21) ----> wrong mapping happens > > We can remove the fallback code because if a high-order > allocation fails, __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() will retry with > order-0. Therefore, it is unnecessary to fallback to order-0 > here. Therefore, fix this by removing the fallback code. > > Fixes: e9c3cda4d86e ("mm, vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations") > Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu > Reported-by: Tangquan Zheng > Cc: > CC: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> > CC: Baoquan He > CC: Matthew Wilcox > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 11 ++--------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index 6b783baf12a1..af2de36549d6 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -3584,15 +3584,8 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, > page = alloc_pages_noprof(alloc_gfp, order); > else > page = alloc_pages_node_noprof(nid, alloc_gfp, order); > - if (unlikely(!page)) { > - if (!nofail) > - break; > - > - /* fall back to the zero order allocations */ > - alloc_gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL; > - order = 0; > - continue; > - } > + if (unlikely(!page)) > + break; This looks great, thanks. Reviewed-by: Baoquan He