From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D2F19F429; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727779314; cv=none; b=nPPW6MfxBjhzRJPCY0Nqshw0PHHdnkyKw3xtBShn4qSA66McHcTDcdJSToqhyxZOCi1mADx69GW3XkBX+TktSQhYD4B6oAL1EHR7A6Ukwxqd/vvUuXSJP2KjD8TELKaFEyyt9cUmv/slBXr2++h17jn1Una0K1AUV3u4DmeIZKU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727779314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3Gj1hgvY9P7eaOCRcE7QQXrpLnua94BE71VWtrO3It0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DeA15usrLN+Ufy4cBESR2ZIz/DOuhglAH9/uug8j1v90pS+Lkm9uBXfps0Z1algivs6CaGnjIXmNepPqe0AaerdXAv3DF1q9ZwqNUAboyZxXJhU88R5wEH0jufNdj7LSV1VpCbXUxRCNtE6vzYgN9bHeu43APV1ftuuYe/gFAp0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=dCGxXMzR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dCGxXMzR" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b95359440so15235345ad.0; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 03:41:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727779313; x=1728384113; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bLP/0R/qMH5dr0opriCBNJUpL7J8DlQGDOnz8+wpL28=; b=dCGxXMzR6B/MFOrf+eVdAkEJd5xH2Xxx3o9jBbAsYvUFJLOUF7ffgZT38Zkpj7/Lrh 7mQs7F0G9C5qjJRgAX3rZ+iovQjiqcd/iITeuGpeyKdo0P21/x67Xd7WRHq3Itrb2gbi Bz2lWfOIX4BsTN8pEecJAUI43ZO8LUjir2KKe53wJkxpIwjmT0ULKra1TXfTaTZbXETZ LG75nDrA3uczYnEowyODHec2fADJWwrmO9BsVywMLXd+1lxUWyAMcQq6ZJbWJQYs8FfW 1F/wkhdzXlgWbYJTKvvCQ76g/W/cfzYPjG9v+hB/Poc2GIg1tpsUwPj7XTb6VKkMEtkC YwNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727779313; x=1728384113; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bLP/0R/qMH5dr0opriCBNJUpL7J8DlQGDOnz8+wpL28=; b=WZ8H4GLQelJpZWJya9CgVweXVgK7c0trn/rF8TEoUWLPPUrIMnQQMZqDHHRc+fxxev T8Q+C52COidYzs9t7S0Vr8pU3FRGB2JlG7e80viZq13HDksR3pfZhTmyQuRfi7ZHacNJ RFBBud6xYwSnNbN8JBoj+BUvkGCl7+P/hg+O41RNb3qB+S13zeY2upHJFKWmZo59kuRR iAkZD+b5et2jxLtu9MKkW2cREAlhRkujyNxPuwyxwKDGHubIITVbOMQ3iFX8G+Bxq7k2 gC6kFpIdMy+ixUizVOXy7kmYAz+2hZAxry+9QQQ48y2WwJ+blsfg2heXkeYcGQmoVrzW RYMw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXSa6nMTkGO+eAOF0Od7vFVT1KdTfrQByg0Fog5rXfEzoJnA/S0oDp1pB0ZDGpCjw/eacim+OGy0vT/dL4CoQ==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxuctlUWVT/E2qC+gemm0CkPQnJdoYSbx+cSVjZVDtWYKqCfxTh mnoV/nb3XTMGxNVBtXifTs2E/IcsA9eyX5LC8cX/odMvzc/us/L/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG0DBH1guwKwQCu1xsDfBN1yGjCjV824CnmfVWedh/uZu+dZK91r1rBml1FEVoPV+/dSoONxA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2307:b0:20b:5046:35b with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20b5046080bmr190442675ad.57.1727779312736; Tue, 01 Oct 2024 03:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:70a4:8eee:1d3f:e71d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2e0b6c4bc99sm9727584a91.11.2024.10.01.03.41.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Oct 2024 03:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 03:41:49 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Greg KH Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com Subject: Re: Patch "Input: ims-pcu - fix calling interruptible mutex" has been added to the 6.11-stable tree Message-ID: References: <20240930232429.2569091-1-sashal@kernel.org> <2024100130-stereo-diner-11ba@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2024100130-stereo-diner-11ba@gregkh> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 11:33:12AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 02:07:21AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 07:24:28PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > > > Input: ims-pcu - fix calling interruptible mutex > > > > > > to the 6.11-stable tree which can be found at: > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > input-ims-pcu-fix-calling-interruptible-mutex.patch > > > and it can be found in the queue-6.11 subdirectory. > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > > please let know about it. > > > > > > > Did you manage to pick up 703f12672e1f ("Input: ims-pcu - switch to > > using cleanup functions") for stable? I would love to see the > > justification for that... > > It already is in the 6.11 kernel tree, so why would this fix, which > says: > > > > commit c137195362a652adfbc6a538b78a40b043de6eb0 > > > Author: David Lechner > > > Date: Tue Sep 10 16:58:47 2024 -0500 > > > > > > Input: ims-pcu - fix calling interruptible mutex > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 82abef590eb31d373e632743262ee7c42f49c289 ] > > > > > > Fix calling scoped_cond_guard() with mutex instead of mutex_intr. > > > > > > scoped_cond_guard(mutex, ...) will call mutex_lock() instead of > > > mutex_lock_interruptible(). > > > > > > Fixes: 703f12672e1f ("Input: ims-pcu - switch to using cleanup functions") > > This is a bugfix for the 6.11 tree, not be applicable to the 6.11.y > releases? Oh, my bad, I did not realize 703f12672e1f made into 6.11. Sorry about this. -- Dmitry