public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/nolibc/stdlib: fix getenv() with empty environment
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:17:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zw+uxLIklMHSSxTu@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241016-nolibc-getenv-v1-1-8bc11abd486d@linutronix.de>

Hi Thomas!

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:14:51PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The environ pointer itself is never NULL, this is guaranteed by crt.h.
> However if the environment is empty, environ will point to a NULL
> pointer.

Good point, however from what I'm seeing on glibc, if the user sets
environ to NULL, getenv() safely reports NULL and doesn't crash. I
don't know what the spec says about environ being NULL, though. I
just tested on freebsd to compare and also get a NULL in this case
as well. So I'd be tempted by keeping the check.

>  	int idx, i;
>  
> -	if (environ) {
> +	if (*environ) {
>  		for (idx = 0; environ[idx]; idx++) {
>  			for (i = 0; name[i] && name[i] == environ[idx][i];)
>  				i++;

However as a quick note, if we decide we don't care about environ being
NULL, and since this is essentially a cleanup, why not even get rid of
the whole "if" condition, since the loop takes care of it ?

FWIW I tested glibc with this:

  #include <stdlib.h>


  int main(int argc, char **argv)
  {
        extern char **environ;

        environ=NULL;
        return getenv("HOME") == NULL;
  }

Cheers,
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-16 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-16 11:14 [PATCH] tools/nolibc/stdlib: fix getenv() with empty environment Thomas Weißschuh
2024-10-16 12:17 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2024-10-16 13:01   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-10-16 14:49     ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zw+uxLIklMHSSxTu@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox