[PATCH 5.4.y 0/4] lockdep: deadlock fix and dependencies

[PATCH 5.4.y 0/4] lockdep: deadlock fix and dependencies

[Carlos Llamas]

This patchset adds the dependencies to apply commit a6f88ac32c6e
("lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu") to the
5.4-stable tree. See the "FAILED" report at [1].

Note the dependencies actually fix a UAF and a bad recursion pattern.
Thus it makes sense to also backport them.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/2024100226-unselfish-triangle-e5eb@gregkh/

Peter Zijlstra (2):
  locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion pattern
  locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lock

Waiman Long (1):
  locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in
    lock_class

Zhiguo Niu (1):
  lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu

 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 90 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog

[PATCH 5.4.y 1/4] locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion pattern

[Carlos Llamas]

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

commit 10476e6304222ced7df9b3d5fb0a043b3c2a1ad8 upstream.

There were two patterns for lockdep_recursion:

Pattern-A:
	if (current->lockdep_recursion)
		return

	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
	/* do stuff */
	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;

Pattern-B:
	current->lockdep_recursion++;
	/* do stuff */
	current->lockdep_recursion--;

But a third pattern has emerged:

Pattern-C:
	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
	/* do stuff */
	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;

And while this isn't broken per-se, it is highly dangerous because it
doesn't nest properly.

Get rid of all Pattern-C instances and shore up Pattern-A with a
warning.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313093325.GW12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 0d9ff8b621e6..0a2be60e4aa7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -389,6 +389,12 @@ void lockdep_on(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_on);
 
+static inline void lockdep_recursion_finish(void)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(--current->lockdep_recursion))
+		current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+}
+
 void lockdep_set_selftest_task(struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	lockdep_selftest_task_struct = task;
@@ -1720,11 +1726,11 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
 	this.class = class;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
 	ret = __lockdep_count_forward_deps(&this);
 	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	current->lockdep_recursion--;
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1749,11 +1755,11 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
 	this.class = class;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
 	ret = __lockdep_count_backward_deps(&this);
 	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	current->lockdep_recursion--;
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -3550,9 +3556,9 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
 	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_context))
 		return;
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	__trace_hardirqs_on_caller(ip);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(lockdep_hardirqs_on);
 
@@ -3608,7 +3614,7 @@ void trace_softirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	/*
 	 * We'll do an OFF -> ON transition:
 	 */
@@ -3623,7 +3629,7 @@ void trace_softirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
 	 */
 	if (curr->hardirqs_enabled)
 		mark_held_locks(curr, LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3877,9 +3883,9 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 			return;
 
 		raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-		current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+		current->lockdep_recursion++;
 		register_lock_class(lock, subclass, 1);
-		current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+		lockdep_recursion_finish();
 		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 }
@@ -4561,11 +4567,11 @@ void lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
 		return;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	check_flags(flags);
 	if (__lock_set_class(lock, name, key, subclass, ip))
 		check_chain_key(current);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_set_class);
@@ -4578,11 +4584,11 @@ void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
 		return;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	check_flags(flags);
 	if (__lock_downgrade(lock, ip))
 		check_chain_key(current);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_downgrade);
@@ -4603,11 +4609,11 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	trace_lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check, nest_lock, ip);
 	__lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check,
 		       irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip, 0, 0);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_acquire);
@@ -4622,11 +4628,11 @@ void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested,
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	trace_lock_release(lock, ip);
 	if (__lock_release(lock, ip))
 		check_chain_key(current);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_release);
@@ -4642,9 +4648,9 @@ int lock_is_held_type(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read)
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	ret = __lock_is_held(lock, read);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -4663,9 +4669,9 @@ struct pin_cookie lock_pin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	cookie = __lock_pin_lock(lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return cookie;
@@ -4682,9 +4688,9 @@ void lock_repin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie cookie)
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	__lock_repin_lock(lock, cookie);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_repin_lock);
@@ -4699,9 +4705,9 @@ void lock_unpin_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct pin_cookie cookie)
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	__lock_unpin_lock(lock, cookie);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_unpin_lock);
@@ -4837,10 +4843,10 @@ void lock_contended(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	trace_lock_contended(lock, ip);
 	__lock_contended(lock, ip);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_contended);
@@ -4857,9 +4863,9 @@ void lock_acquired(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip)
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	__lock_acquired(lock, ip);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_acquired);
@@ -5087,7 +5093,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 
 	/* closed head */
 	pf = delayed_free.pf + (delayed_free.index ^ 1);
@@ -5099,7 +5105,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
 	 */
 	call_rcu_zapped(delayed_free.pf + delayed_free.index);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	current->lockdep_recursion--;
 	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
@@ -5146,11 +5152,11 @@ static void lockdep_free_key_range_reg(void *start, unsigned long size)
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	pf = get_pending_free();
 	__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, start, size);
 	call_rcu_zapped(pf);
-	current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+	current->lockdep_recursion--;
 	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog

[PATCH 5.4.y 2/4] locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lock

[Carlos Llamas]

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

commit 248efb2158f1e23750728e92ad9db3ab60c14485 upstream.

A few sites want to assert we own the graph_lock/lockdep_lock, provide
a more conventional lock interface for it with a number of trivial
debug checks.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313102107.GX12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 0a2be60e4aa7..b9fabbab3918 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -84,12 +84,39 @@ module_param(lock_stat, int, 0644);
  * to use a raw spinlock - we really dont want the spinlock
  * code to recurse back into the lockdep code...
  */
-static arch_spinlock_t lockdep_lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+static arch_spinlock_t __lock = (arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+static struct task_struct *__owner;
+
+static inline void lockdep_lock(void)
+{
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
+	arch_spin_lock(&__lock);
+	__owner = current;
+	current->lockdep_recursion++;
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_unlock(void)
+{
+	if (debug_locks && DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner != current))
+		return;
+
+	current->lockdep_recursion--;
+	__owner = NULL;
+	arch_spin_unlock(&__lock);
+}
+
+static inline bool lockdep_assert_locked(void)
+{
+	return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner != current);
+}
+
 static struct task_struct *lockdep_selftest_task_struct;
 
+
 static int graph_lock(void)
 {
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_lock();
 	/*
 	 * Make sure that if another CPU detected a bug while
 	 * walking the graph we dont change it (while the other
@@ -97,27 +124,15 @@ static int graph_lock(void)
 	 * dropped already)
 	 */
 	if (!debug_locks) {
-		arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+		lockdep_unlock();
 		return 0;
 	}
-	/* prevent any recursions within lockdep from causing deadlocks */
-	current->lockdep_recursion++;
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static inline int graph_unlock(void)
+static inline void graph_unlock(void)
 {
-	if (debug_locks && !arch_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock)) {
-		/*
-		 * The lockdep graph lock isn't locked while we expect it to
-		 * be, we're confused now, bye!
-		 */
-		return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
-	}
-
-	current->lockdep_recursion--;
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
-	return 0;
+	lockdep_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -128,7 +143,7 @@ static inline int debug_locks_off_graph_unlock(void)
 {
 	int ret = debug_locks_off();
 
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1476,6 +1491,8 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 	struct circular_queue *cq = &lock_cq;
 	int ret = 1;
 
+	lockdep_assert_locked();
+
 	if (match(source_entry, data)) {
 		*target_entry = source_entry;
 		ret = 0;
@@ -1498,8 +1515,6 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry,
 
 		head = get_dep_list(lock, offset);
 
-		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
-
 		list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, head, entry) {
 			if (!lock_accessed(entry)) {
 				unsigned int cq_depth;
@@ -1726,11 +1741,9 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
 	this.class = class;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion++;
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_lock();
 	ret = __lockdep_count_forward_deps(&this);
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion--;
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1755,11 +1768,9 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
 	this.class = class;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	current->lockdep_recursion++;
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_lock();
 	ret = __lockdep_count_backward_deps(&this);
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion--;
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -2930,7 +2941,7 @@ static inline int add_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
 	 * disabled to make this an IRQ-safe lock.. for recursion reasons
 	 * lockdep won't complain about its own locking errors.
 	 */
-	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
+	if (lockdep_assert_locked())
 		return 0;
 
 	chain = alloc_lock_chain();
@@ -5092,8 +5103,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
 		return;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion++;
+	lockdep_lock();
 
 	/* closed head */
 	pf = delayed_free.pf + (delayed_free.index ^ 1);
@@ -5105,8 +5115,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
 	 */
 	call_rcu_zapped(delayed_free.pf + delayed_free.index);
 
-	current->lockdep_recursion--;
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
@@ -5151,13 +5160,11 @@ static void lockdep_free_key_range_reg(void *start, unsigned long size)
 	init_data_structures_once();
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
-	current->lockdep_recursion++;
+	lockdep_lock();
 	pf = get_pending_free();
 	__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, start, size);
 	call_rcu_zapped(pf);
-	current->lockdep_recursion--;
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	/*
@@ -5179,10 +5186,10 @@ static void lockdep_free_key_range_imm(void *start, unsigned long size)
 	init_data_structures_once();
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_lock();
 	__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, start, size);
 	__free_zapped_classes(pf);
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
@@ -5278,10 +5285,10 @@ static void lockdep_reset_lock_imm(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	arch_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_lock();
 	__lockdep_reset_lock(pf, lock);
 	__free_zapped_classes(pf);
-	arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog

[PATCH 5.4.y 3/4] locking/lockdep: Avoid potential access of invalid memory in lock_class

[Carlos Llamas]

From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

commit 61cc4534b6550997c97a03759ab46b29d44c0017 upstream.

It was found that reading /proc/lockdep after a lockdep splat may
potentially cause an access to freed memory if lockdep_unregister_key()
is called after the splat but before access to /proc/lockdep [1]. This
is due to the fact that graph_lock() call in lockdep_unregister_key()
fails after the clearing of debug_locks by the splat process.

After lockdep_unregister_key() is called, the lock_name may be freed
but the corresponding lock_class structure still have a reference to
it. That invalid memory pointer will then be accessed when /proc/lockdep
is read by a user and a use-after-free (UAF) error will be reported if
KASAN is enabled.

To fix this problem, lockdep_unregister_key() is now modified to always
search for a matching key irrespective of the debug_locks state and
zap the corresponding lock class if a matching one is found.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/77f05c15-81b6-bddd-9650-80d5f23fe330@i-love.sakura.ne.jp/

Fixes: 8b39adbee805 ("locking/lockdep: Make lockdep_unregister_key() honor 'debug_locks' again")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220103023558.1377055-1-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index b9fabbab3918..8e0351970a1d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -5302,7 +5302,13 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 		lockdep_reset_lock_reg(lock);
 }
 
-/* Unregister a dynamically allocated key. */
+/*
+ * Unregister a dynamically allocated key.
+ *
+ * Unlike lockdep_register_key(), a search is always done to find a matching
+ * key irrespective of debug_locks to avoid potential invalid access to freed
+ * memory in lock_class entry.
+ */
 void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *hash_head = keyhashentry(key);
@@ -5317,10 +5323,8 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 		return;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-	if (!graph_lock())
-		goto out_irq;
+	lockdep_lock();
 
-	pf = get_pending_free();
 	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(k, hash_head, hash_entry) {
 		if (k == key) {
 			hlist_del_rcu(&k->hash_entry);
@@ -5328,11 +5332,13 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!found);
-	__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
-	call_rcu_zapped(pf);
-	graph_unlock();
-out_irq:
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!found && debug_locks);
+	if (found) {
+		pf = get_pending_free();
+		__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
+		call_rcu_zapped(pf);
+	}
+	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	/* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog

[PATCH 5.4.y 4/4] lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu

[Carlos Llamas]

From: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>

commit a6f88ac32c6e63e69c595bfae220d8641704c9b7 upstream.

There is a deadlock scenario between lockdep and rcu when
rcu nocb feature is enabled, just as following call stack:

     rcuop/x
-000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80, val = ?)
-001|queued_spin_lock(inline) // try to hold nocb_gp_lock
-001|do_raw_spin_lock(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80)
-002|__raw_spin_lock_irqsave(inline)
-002|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8A80)
-003|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline)
-003|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F30B680)
-004|__call_rcu_common(inline)
-004|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC082EECC28, func = ?)
-005|call_rcu_zapped(inline)
-005|free_zapped_rcu(ch = ?)// hold graph lock
-006|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F245680)
-007|nocb_cb_wait(inline)
-007|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F245680)
-008|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF80803122C0)
-009|ret_from_fork(asm)

     rcuop/y
-000|queued_spin_lock_slowpath(lock = 0xFFFFFFC08291BBC8, val = 0)
-001|queued_spin_lock()
-001|lockdep_lock()
-001|graph_lock() // try to hold graph lock
-002|lookup_chain_cache_add()
-002|validate_chain()
-003|lock_acquire
-004|_raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock = 0xFFFFFF817F211D80)
-005|lock_timer_base(inline)
-006|mod_timer(inline)
-006|wake_nocb_gp_defer(inline)// hold nocb_gp_lock
-006|__call_rcu_nocb_wake(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F2A8680)
-007|__call_rcu_common(inline)
-007|call_rcu(head = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58, func = ?)
-008|call_rcu_hurry(inline)
-008|rcu_sync_call(inline)
-008|rcu_sync_func(rhp = 0xFFFFFFC0822E0B58)
-009|rcu_do_batch(rdp = 0xFFFFFF817F266680)
-010|nocb_cb_wait(inline)
-010|rcu_nocb_cb_kthread(arg = 0xFFFFFF817F266680)
-011|kthread(_create = 0xFFFFFF8080363740)
-012|ret_from_fork(asm)

rcuop/x and rcuop/y are rcu nocb threads with the same nocb gp thread.
This patch release the graph lock before lockdep call_rcu.

Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620225436.3127927-1-cmllamas@google.com
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 8e0351970a1d..7cc790a262de 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -5054,25 +5054,27 @@ static struct pending_free *get_pending_free(void)
 static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *cb);
 
 /*
- * Schedule an RCU callback if no RCU callback is pending. Must be called with
- * the graph lock held.
- */
-static void call_rcu_zapped(struct pending_free *pf)
+* See if we need to queue an RCU callback, must called with
+* the lockdep lock held, returns false if either we don't have
+* any pending free or the callback is already scheduled.
+* Otherwise, a call_rcu() must follow this function call.
+*/
+static bool prepare_call_rcu_zapped(struct pending_free *pf)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(inside_selftest());
 
 	if (list_empty(&pf->zapped))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	if (delayed_free.scheduled)
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	delayed_free.scheduled = true;
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(delayed_free.pf + delayed_free.index != pf);
 	delayed_free.index ^= 1;
 
-	call_rcu(&delayed_free.rcu_head, free_zapped_rcu);
+	return true;
 }
 
 /* The caller must hold the graph lock. May be called from RCU context. */
@@ -5098,6 +5100,7 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
 {
 	struct pending_free *pf;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool need_callback;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ch != &delayed_free.rcu_head))
 		return;
@@ -5109,14 +5112,18 @@ static void free_zapped_rcu(struct rcu_head *ch)
 	pf = delayed_free.pf + (delayed_free.index ^ 1);
 	__free_zapped_classes(pf);
 	delayed_free.scheduled = false;
+	need_callback =
+		prepare_call_rcu_zapped(delayed_free.pf + delayed_free.index);
+	lockdep_unlock();
+	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	/*
-	 * If there's anything on the open list, close and start a new callback.
-	 */
-	call_rcu_zapped(delayed_free.pf + delayed_free.index);
+	* If there's pending free and its callback has not been scheduled,
+	* queue an RCU callback.
+	*/
+	if (need_callback)
+		call_rcu(&delayed_free.rcu_head, free_zapped_rcu);
 
-	lockdep_unlock();
-	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5156,6 +5163,7 @@ static void lockdep_free_key_range_reg(void *start, unsigned long size)
 {
 	struct pending_free *pf;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool need_callback;
 
 	init_data_structures_once();
 
@@ -5163,10 +5171,11 @@ static void lockdep_free_key_range_reg(void *start, unsigned long size)
 	lockdep_lock();
 	pf = get_pending_free();
 	__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, start, size);
-	call_rcu_zapped(pf);
+	need_callback = prepare_call_rcu_zapped(pf);
 	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
-
+	if (need_callback)
+		call_rcu(&delayed_free.rcu_head, free_zapped_rcu);
 	/*
 	 * Wait for any possible iterators from look_up_lock_class() to pass
 	 * before continuing to free the memory they refer to.
@@ -5260,6 +5269,7 @@ static void lockdep_reset_lock_reg(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 	struct pending_free *pf;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int locked;
+	bool need_callback = false;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	locked = graph_lock();
@@ -5268,11 +5278,13 @@ static void lockdep_reset_lock_reg(struct lockdep_map *lock)
 
 	pf = get_pending_free();
 	__lockdep_reset_lock(pf, lock);
-	call_rcu_zapped(pf);
+	need_callback = prepare_call_rcu_zapped(pf);
 
 	graph_unlock();
 out_irq:
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+	if (need_callback)
+		call_rcu(&delayed_free.rcu_head, free_zapped_rcu);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5316,6 +5328,7 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 	struct pending_free *pf;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool found = false;
+	bool need_callback = false;
 
 	might_sleep();
 
@@ -5336,11 +5349,14 @@ void lockdep_unregister_key(struct lock_class_key *key)
 	if (found) {
 		pf = get_pending_free();
 		__lockdep_free_key_range(pf, key, 1);
-		call_rcu_zapped(pf);
+		need_callback = prepare_call_rcu_zapped(pf);
 	}
 	lockdep_unlock();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 
+	if (need_callback)
+		call_rcu(&delayed_free.rcu_head, free_zapped_rcu);
+
 	/* Wait until is_dynamic_key() has finished accessing k->hash_entry. */
 	synchronize_rcu();
 }
-- 
2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog

Re: [PATCH 5.4.y 0/4] lockdep: deadlock fix and dependencies

[Sasha Levin]

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:22:40PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
>This patchset adds the dependencies to apply commit a6f88ac32c6e
>("lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu") to the
>5.4-stable tree. See the "FAILED" report at [1].
>
>Note the dependencies actually fix a UAF and a bad recursion pattern.
>Thus it makes sense to also backport them.

Hm, it does not seem to apply on 5.4 for me. Could you please take a
look?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

Re: [PATCH 5.4.y 0/4] lockdep: deadlock fix and dependencies

[Carlos Llamas]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:23:26AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:22:40PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> > This patchset adds the dependencies to apply commit a6f88ac32c6e
> > ("lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu") to the
> > 5.4-stable tree. See the "FAILED" report at [1].
> > 
> > Note the dependencies actually fix a UAF and a bad recursion pattern.
> > Thus it makes sense to also backport them.
> 
> Hm, it does not seem to apply on 5.4 for me. Could you please take a
> look?

I'm not sure where the disconnect is, I am able to do ...

$ git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
$ git fetch FETCH_HEAD
$ b4 shazam https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241012232244.2768048-1-cmllamas@google.com/

... with no issues. I don't have anything on my gitconfig that would
change the default behavior of `git am` or `git cherry-pick` either.

Anything else I should try or look into?

--
Carlos Llamas

Re: [PATCH 5.4.y 0/4] lockdep: deadlock fix and dependencies

[Sasha Levin]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 03:29:34PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:23:26AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 11:22:40PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
>> > This patchset adds the dependencies to apply commit a6f88ac32c6e
>> > ("lockdep: fix deadlock issue between lockdep and rcu") to the
>> > 5.4-stable tree. See the "FAILED" report at [1].
>> >
>> > Note the dependencies actually fix a UAF and a bad recursion pattern.
>> > Thus it makes sense to also backport them.
>>
>> Hm, it does not seem to apply on 5.4 for me. Could you please take a
>> look?
>
>I'm not sure where the disconnect is, I am able to do ...
>
>$ git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
>$ git fetch FETCH_HEAD
>$ b4 shazam https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241012232244.2768048-1-cmllamas@google.com/
>
>... with no issues. I don't have anything on my gitconfig that would
>change the default behavior of `git am` or `git cherry-pick` either.
>
>Anything else I should try or look into?

Sorry, my bad, now queued up.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha