stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
	Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal: restore the override_rlimit logic
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:21:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZykQnp9mINnsPTg2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241103165048.GA11668@redhat.com>

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/02, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> >
> > +Cc Oleg Nesterov.
> 
> Well, I tend to agree with Roman and his patch looks good to me.

Thanks, Oleg!

> 
> But it seems that the change in inc_rlimit_get_ucounts() can be
> a bit simpler and more readable, see below.

Eric suggested the same approach earlier in this thread. I personally
don't have a strong preference here or actually I slightly prefer my
own version because this comparison to LONG_MAX looks confusing to me.
But if you have a strong preference, I'm happy to send out v2. Please,
let me know.

Thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-31 20:04 [PATCH] signal: restore the override_rlimit logic Roman Gushchin
2024-11-01 19:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-11-01 20:38   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-11-01 20:58     ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-11-01 21:21       ` Roman Gushchin
2024-11-01 22:44       ` Andrei Vagin
2024-11-02 16:26         ` Alexey Gladkov
2024-11-03 16:50           ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-11-04 18:21             ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2024-11-04 18:44               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-11-04 19:02                 ` Alexey Gladkov
2024-11-04 19:42                   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-11-01 23:28 ` Alexey Gladkov
2024-11-01 23:50   ` Roman Gushchin
2024-11-02 13:46     ` Alexey Gladkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZykQnp9mINnsPTg2@google.com \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=avagin@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=legion@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).