Re: [PATCH] signal: restore the override_rlimit logic

[Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>]

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:02:35PM +0100, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 07:44:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 11/04, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 05:50:49PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But it seems that the change in inc_rlimit_get_ucounts() can be
> > > > a bit simpler and more readable, see below.
> > >
> > > Eric suggested the same approach earlier in this thread.
> > 
> > Ah, good, I didn't know ;)
> > 
> > > I personally
> > > don't have a strong preference here or actually I slightly prefer my
> > > own version because this comparison to LONG_MAX looks confusing to me.
> > > But if you have a strong preference, I'm happy to send out v2. Please,
> > > let me know.
> > 
> > Well, I won't insist.
> > 
> > To me the change proposed by Eric and me looks much more readable, but
> > of course this is subjective.
> > 
> > But you know, you can safely ignore me. Alexey and Eric understand this
> > code much better, so I leave this to you/Alexey/Eric.
> 
> Personally, I like Oleg's patch more.

Ok, I'll send out a v2 shortly.

Thanks!