From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98DDF18FC89 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731694770; cv=none; b=APYiz8ib1NKWVm6J73/E4bOmDo32IItq9T657RF24NsS3PK/BxZVwrQl997/NUNAG+g6+MALc48AFZRaG8v1JPxUV6l//bCwXiIme+7+5qawqYlLtQSF9n9O+CMY/kVLZ+j5sVlxGjUpcGOgq1w9EDT3foCcspqAKOQo7OcWoBs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731694770; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8WF+IXOI/5KHH0almhkCtR9LN7cZH20aNAhAqFaHpxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mYAb11e2pk1/T1rCgEAptu2SPkNwAuhA6Ia9zTklSvFceyMSCwIiD81JwU++HVYbWDr6z5cxUk4tmyPSBRnjkTtq0WyAPQr0sUx4Tsd+447wiaYyvY29IO1eqsOYaT4/VuMEhjkcElPshN1JkPVkSaywkHzTs15cPFp/FstOpRo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=osandov.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=osandov.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=osandov-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@osandov-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=HjLm6roH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=osandov.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=osandov.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=osandov-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@osandov-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="HjLm6roH" Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20cafd36ed0so1331495ad.3 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:19:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=osandov-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1731694768; x=1732299568; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8EINp2KfOlgy1t9t+KySlnYW/+lvzTTAO/KkEajQ4yM=; b=HjLm6roHhlBvvJLmUYeAKVzUpWhneQtpDcTqaSYOj8X5z3uZ+m/RP5V7iuLQnnpwad loCDMid+rt42sZUIugxolZ4YNyIEs9RgdN3sys107mmo1tznv+Dul19fydiKGc4pAb8l dQPTRyFF76LHAuHHI67YxcTHKeJPRqNXVO7ntsaBHCI2/wjWYfIGu9zq6Ve9KqvRbeyL hJxT/hHjnsVsioTdHDZ+mpU5JjKwITK+rlpiHsXvN+zOcnFzjKJI1+/k5SbeMMFS4uI4 jXANAjjncFqiph82xxlUE++hEq4ccz4uehNSYCR+6vNIS5qmgVVEWPgYaRRX1vgwcC7s lRow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731694768; x=1732299568; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8EINp2KfOlgy1t9t+KySlnYW/+lvzTTAO/KkEajQ4yM=; b=jAd66UNeDe+b4NXy+dH03WoJsTYs7O8yU0sBD2Ue56CP+/frLBhJA4vdlQgDxuCy/b GdvaeWtn6zFteUtciqYYnCSS1BSKr+GxiuSEVNf9WuVq8CBZkkdQZunlwzF+JuIZYrsY F4ASyQGMsu9Dng9FmRoXm9ihERSaH3RyMlf1/jrw2sm/K0OrF4mLaixnrjEgWv4B4aZa nnvWSsmDDnDc+He06v1R5L7IlaysJoIPGq4yFgm2tf1h0d3Msqc22yzXy7jF8QChIdLd +GdYa4VbGKYgbYpmqECY/fKANLWgVz133pRdxDfwD3F9b85JN9COsP4+JOVEPkWd6nqm 216A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUGBqJVScbz9ZNMkDDTs+vh61IHXzgarfzb/o4fVW1Ch3SgR9IqQ7eIG7XQexY0E7EqqPTf4T4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqPKMXDUdfsMN4+lp5sFFXwsPHx5LtBro8yqwgRuhq4xOK/6e7 c92k28Z0EB1AnwrAjbUd1pXdzGVPp9Q+elpFcbh+X0NKoETjMZIJnOE7G7qDZYc= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctC2Ni/NwSAqHLumiIu2P2UEUm9AgmjyxsYUP3nftg87beEvx2lkZY+PxNzYih zS3v2z2xKrw0BHC91sOUznBxkFcXHl57/C4UZ7BPLypdi9ya8xl9XYI1eO7nGFyen3I2h1FnKLZ p9XBzV6qEhWHHs2GjCRNZz11lCXgtBB6UnDxlyG6EH4TzsRpO4+8qMS20te9ZeWiwwQXgOYZVLb q7Wmu83tfIR5zojZZ6nrZiFugjVaP2gtg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGx/2L8ZJlSqHsSFOYflEuyJXNV7qZw7rajp1+I37IhqsEhLDkOvbrmAvKWVgAckAVHJDGorA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db08:b0:20c:c482:1d6d with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-211d0d81c1cmr21369865ad.8.1731694767756; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:19:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from telecaster ([2620:10d:c090:500::7:3740]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-211d0f4535csm15203175ad.178.2024.11.15.10.19.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:19:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:19:25 -0800 From: Omar Sandoval To: Greg KH , stable@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Greg KH , stable@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Subject: Re: Fix build ID parsing logic in stable trees Message-ID: References: <20241104175256.2327164-1-jolsa@kernel.org> <2024110536-agonizing-campus-21f0@gregkh> <2024110636-rebound-chip-f389@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:12:39PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:07:39PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 3:26 PM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:04:05PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 12:57:34PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 07:12:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 10:15:04AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 07:54:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:52:52PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > > > sending fix for buildid parsing that affects only stable trees > > > > > > > > > > after merging upstream fix [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Upstream then factored out the whole buildid parsing code, so it > > > > > > > > > > does not have the problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not just take those patches instead? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess we could, but I thought it's too big for stable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we'd need following 2 changes to fix the issue: > > > > > > > > de3ec364c3c3 lib/buildid: add single folio-based file reader abstraction > > > > > > > > 60c845b4896b lib/buildid: take into account e_phoff when fetching program headers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and there's also few other follow ups: > > > > > > > > 5ac9b4e935df lib/buildid: Handle memfd_secret() files in build_id_parse() > > > > > > > > cdbb44f9a74f lib/buildid: don't limit .note.gnu.build-id to the first page in ELF > > > > > > > > ad41251c290d lib/buildid: implement sleepable build_id_parse() API > > > > > > > > 45b8fc309654 lib/buildid: rename build_id_parse() into build_id_parse_nofault() > > > > > > > > 4e9d360c4cdf lib/buildid: remove single-page limit for PHDR search > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which I guess are not strictly needed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you verify what exact ones are needed here? We'll be glad to take > > > > > > > them if you can verify that they work properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > ok, will check > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I noticed that the BUILD-ID field in vmcoreinfo is broken on > > > > > stable/longterm kernels and found this thread. Can we please get this > > > > > fixed soon? > > > > > > > > > > I tried cherry-picking the patches mentioned above ("lib/buildid: add > > > > > single folio-based file reader abstraction" and "lib/buildid: take into > > > > > account e_phoff when fetching program headers"), but they don't apply > > > > > cleanly before 6.11, and they'd need to be reworked for 5.15, which was > > > > > before folios were introduced. Jiri's minimal fix works for me and seems > > > > > like a much safer option. > > > > > > > > hi, > > > > thanks for testing > > > > > > > > I think for 6.11 we could go with backport of: > > > > de3ec364c3c3 lib/buildid: add single folio-based file reader abstraction > > > > 60c845b4896b lib/buildid: take into account e_phoff when fetching program headers > > > > > > > > and with the small fix for the rest > > > > > > > > but I still need to figure out why also 60c845b4896b is needed > > > > to fix the issue on 6.11.. hopefully today > > > > > > ok, so the fix the issue in 6.11 with upstream backports we'd need both: > > > > > > 1) de3ec364c3c3 lib/buildid: add single folio-based file reader abstraction > > > 2) 60c845b4896b lib/buildid: take into account e_phoff when fetching program headers > > > > > > 2) is needed because 1) seems to omit ehdr->e_phoff addition (patch below) > > > which is added back in 2) > > > > > > IMO 6.11 is close to upstream and by taking above upstream fixes it will be > > > easier to backport other possible fixes in the future, for other trees I'd > > > take the original one line fix I posted > > > > I still maintain that very minimal is the way to go instead of risking > > bringing new potential regressions by partially backporting folio > > rework patchset. > > > > Jiri, there is no point in risking this, best to fix this quickly and > > minimally. If we ever need to backport further fixes, *then* we can > > think about folio-based implementation backport. > > ok, make sense, the original plan works for me as well > > jirka Greg, could you please queue up Jiri's one line fixes for 5.15, 6.1, 6.6, and 6.11? Thanks, Omar