From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
To: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, imv4bel@gmail.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev,
stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y v3 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:33:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a194c1df-8e39-48b9-a8f5-696e32558bad@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511074104.60836-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com>
Hi,
On 11/05/26 13:11, Wentao Guan wrote:
> [Readd rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy which missed in 016725807ce3 in v6.12.86]
> Stable-dep-of: aa54b1d27fe0 ("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when
> paged frags are present")
Yes, I noticed this too.
But you got the commit wrong I think: (you probably meant)
the rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy() addition was missed in commit:
bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure")
Greg: Summary: (it might help)
The stable backport bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after
skb_unshare() failure") is a backport of commit: 1f2740150f90 ("rxrpc:
Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure") to 6.12.y:
stable backport bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after
skb_unshare() failure") adds this which is not part of upstream commit:
+ EM(rxrpc_skb_get_call_rx, "GET call-rx ") \
But missed adding: which is added in upstream commit:
+ EM(rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy, "PUT resp-cpy ") \
Hence Wentao needs to add rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy() in this backport.
Thanks,
Harshit
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan<guanwentao@uniontech.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 1 +
> net/rxrpc/conn_event.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> index 9377acad0c5f9..63efc9e4e4102 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_jumbo_subpacket, "PUT jumbo-sub") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_last_nack, "PUT last-nack") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_purge, "PUT purge ") \
> + EM(rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy, "PUT resp-cpy ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_rotate, "PUT rotate ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_put_unknown, "PUT unknown ") \
> EM(rxrpc_skb_see_conn_work, "SEE conn-work") \
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> index 82cc72123c9c9..6dcfaed1f7485 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,33 @@ static void rxrpc_call_is_secure(struct rxrpc_call *call)
> rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 6:02 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-11 7:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:27 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:28 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 2/2] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:28 ` [PATCH " Greg KH
2026-05-11 7:33 ` Re: [PATCH 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:39 ` Greg KH
2026-05-11 7:41 ` [PATCH 6.12.y v3 " Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 8:03 ` Harshit Mogalapalli [this message]
2026-05-11 8:16 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-12 0:17 ` Sasha Levin
2026-05-12 2:04 ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:41 ` [PATCH 6.12.y v3 2/2] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11 7:28 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a194c1df-8e39-48b9-a8f5-696e32558bad@oracle.com \
--to=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guanwentao@uniontech.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox