Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
To: Wentao Guan <guanwentao@uniontech.com>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, imv4bel@gmail.com, jiayuan.chen@linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12.y v3 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 13:33:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a194c1df-8e39-48b9-a8f5-696e32558bad@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511074104.60836-1-guanwentao@uniontech.com>

Hi,


On 11/05/26 13:11, Wentao Guan wrote:
> [Readd rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy which missed in 016725807ce3 in v6.12.86]
> Stable-dep-of: aa54b1d27fe0 ("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when
> paged frags are present")

Yes, I noticed this too.

But you got the commit wrong I think: (you probably meant)

the rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy() addition was missed in commit: 
bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure")

Greg: Summary: (it might help)

The stable backport bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after 
skb_unshare() failure") is a backport of commit: 1f2740150f90 ("rxrpc: 
Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure") to 6.12.y:


stable backport bf20f46d94f1 ("rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after 
skb_unshare() failure") adds this which is not part of upstream commit:
+       EM(rxrpc_skb_get_call_rx,               "GET call-rx  ") \

But missed adding: which is added in upstream commit:
+       EM(rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy,         "PUT resp-cpy ") \


Hence Wentao needs to add rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy() in this backport.


Thanks,
Harshit



> Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan<guanwentao@uniontech.com>
> ---
>   include/trace/events/rxrpc.h |  1 +
>   net/rxrpc/conn_event.c       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> index 9377acad0c5f9..63efc9e4e4102 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
>   	EM(rxrpc_skb_put_jumbo_subpacket,	"PUT jumbo-sub") \
>   	EM(rxrpc_skb_put_last_nack,		"PUT last-nack") \
>   	EM(rxrpc_skb_put_purge,			"PUT purge    ") \
> +	EM(rxrpc_skb_put_response_copy,		"PUT resp-cpy ") \




>   	EM(rxrpc_skb_put_rotate,		"PUT rotate   ") \
>   	EM(rxrpc_skb_put_unknown,		"PUT unknown  ") \
>   	EM(rxrpc_skb_see_conn_work,		"SEE conn-work") \
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> index 82cc72123c9c9..6dcfaed1f7485 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,33 @@ static void rxrpc_call_is_secure(struct rxrpc_call *call)
>   		rxrpc_notify_socket(call);
>   }


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11  6:02 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-11  7:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:18   ` [PATCH 2/2] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:27     ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:28     ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 2/2] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:28     ` [PATCH " Greg KH
2026-05-11  7:33       ` Re: [PATCH 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:39         ` Greg KH
2026-05-11  7:41           ` [PATCH 6.12.y v3 " Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  8:03             ` Harshit Mogalapalli [this message]
2026-05-11  8:16               ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-12  0:17             ` Sasha Levin
2026-05-12  2:04               ` Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:41           ` [PATCH 6.12.y v3 2/2] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:43           ` [PATCH 1/2] rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets Wentao Guan
2026-05-11  7:28   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a194c1df-8e39-48b9-a8f5-696e32558bad@oracle.com \
    --to=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guanwentao@uniontech.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox