From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <vdubeyko@redhat.com>
To: Tristan Madani <tristmd@gmail.com>,
slava@dubeyko.com, glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de,
frank.li@vivo.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+a19ca73b21fe8bc69101@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hfs: validate bitmap record offset in hfs_bmap_alloc
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 16:05:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a274aafb30abfee53d81525028ae64ebe9316620.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418133949.1713416-1-tristan@talencesecurity.com>
On Sat, 2026-04-18 at 13:39 +0000, Tristan Madani wrote:
> hfs_bmap_alloc() retrieves the bitmap record from the header node
> using hfs_brec_lenoff() but does not validate the returned offset
> and length before using them to compute page pointers. On a crafted
> HFS image with corrupted B-tree data, the offset can exceed the node
> size, causing an out-of-bounds page access.
>
> Additionally, when the bitmap has node 0 bit incorrectly unset,
> hfs_bmap_alloc() calls hfs_bnode_create(tree, 0) for the already-
> hashed header node, triggering a WARN_ON and returning the existing
> node without incrementing its reference count.
>
> Port the fixes already applied to HFS+ (commits d8a73cc46c84 and
> 738d5a51864e) to the HFS side:
>
> 1. Move is_bnode_offset_valid() and check_and_correct_requested_length()
> from bnode.c to btree.h so they can be used by btree.c.
>
> 2. Validate the record offset and length in hfs_bmap_alloc() before
> computing page pointers, preventing out-of-bounds access.
>
> 3. Return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST) from hfs_bnode_create() when the node is
> already hashed, properly signaling filesystem corruption to callers.
I assume that we have the second version of the patch again. Am I correct?
> Reported-by: syzbot+a19ca73b21fe8bc69101@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+a19ca73b21fe8bc69101@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a19ca73b21fe8bc69101
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
> ---
> fs/hfs/bnode.c | 44 +-------------------------------------------
> fs/hfs/btree.c | 6 ++++++
> fs/hfs/btree.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/bnode.c b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> index 13d58c51fc46b..26c2e65ab5935 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/bnode.c
> @@ -15,48 +15,6 @@
>
> #include "btree.h"
>
> -static inline
> -bool is_bnode_offset_valid(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
> -{
> - bool is_valid = off < node->tree->node_size;
> -
> - if (!is_valid) {
> - pr_err("requested invalid offset: "
> - "NODE: id %u, type %#x, height %u, "
> - "node_size %u, offset %u\n",
> - node->this, node->type, node->height,
> - node->tree->node_size, off);
> - }
> -
> - return is_valid;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -u32 check_and_correct_requested_length(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off, u32 len)
> -{
> - unsigned int node_size;
> -
> - if (!is_bnode_offset_valid(node, off))
> - return 0;
> -
> - node_size = node->tree->node_size;
> -
> - if ((off + len) > node_size) {
> - u32 new_len = node_size - off;
> -
> - pr_err("requested length has been corrected: "
> - "NODE: id %u, type %#x, height %u, "
> - "node_size %u, offset %u, "
> - "requested_len %u, corrected_len %u\n",
> - node->this, node->type, node->height,
> - node->tree->node_size, off, len, new_len);
> -
> - return new_len;
> - }
> -
> - return len;
> -}
> -
> void hfs_bnode_read(struct hfs_bnode *node, void *buf, u32 off, u32 len)
> {
> struct page *page;
> @@ -518,7 +476,7 @@ struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bnode_create(struct hfs_btree *tree, u32 num)
> if (node) {
> pr_crit("new node %u already hashed?\n", num);
> WARN_ON(1);
> - return node;
> + return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
> }
> node = __hfs_bnode_create(tree, num);
> if (!node)
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.c b/fs/hfs/btree.c
> index 2eb37a2f64e86..e8bc24c8baf1a 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/btree.c
> +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ struct hfs_bnode *hfs_bmap_alloc(struct hfs_btree *tree)
> len = hfs_brec_lenoff(node, 2, &off16);
> off = off16;
>
> + if (!is_bnode_offset_valid(node, off)) {
> + hfs_bnode_put(node);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> + }
> + len = check_and_correct_requested_length(node, off, len);
> +
> off += node->page_offset;
> pagep = node->page + (off >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> data = kmap_local_page(*pagep);
> diff --git a/fs/hfs/btree.h b/fs/hfs/btree.h
> index 99be858b24465..6032b14b1639d 100644
> --- a/fs/hfs/btree.h
> +++ b/fs/hfs/btree.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,48 @@ struct hfs_find_data {
> };
>
>
> +static inline
> +bool is_bnode_offset_valid(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off)
> +{
> + bool is_valid = off < node->tree->node_size;
> +
> + if (!is_valid) {
> + pr_err("requested invalid offset: "
> + "NODE: id %u, type %#x, height %u, "
> + "node_size %u, offset %u\n",
> + node->this, node->type, node->height,
> + node->tree->node_size, off);
> + }
> +
> + return is_valid;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
> +u32 check_and_correct_requested_length(struct hfs_bnode *node, u32 off, u32 len)
> +{
> + unsigned int node_size;
> +
> + if (!is_bnode_offset_valid(node, off))
> + return 0;
> +
> + node_size = node->tree->node_size;
> +
> + if ((off + len) > node_size) {
> + u32 new_len = node_size - off;
> +
> + pr_err("requested length has been corrected: "
> + "NODE: id %u, type %#x, height %u, "
> + "node_size %u, offset %u, "
> + "requested_len %u, corrected_len %u\n",
> + node->this, node->type, node->height,
> + node->tree->node_size, off, len, new_len);
> +
> + return new_len;
> + }
> +
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> /* btree.c */
> extern struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct super_block *sb, u32 id,
> btree_keycmp keycmp);
This modification makes sense but I mean the porting of slightly different
functionality. Are you working on it? Or have you missed my point?
Thanks,
Slava.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 13:39 [PATCH] hfs: validate bitmap record offset in hfs_bmap_alloc Tristan Madani
2026-04-22 23:05 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a274aafb30abfee53d81525028ae64ebe9316620.camel@redhat.com \
--to=vdubeyko@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frank.li@vivo.com \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+a19ca73b21fe8bc69101@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tristan@talencesecurity.com \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox