Linux kernel -stable discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
To: "Moritz Mühlenhoff" <jmm@inutil.org>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	Melvin Vermeeren <vermeeren@vermwa.re>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	1104460@bugs.debian.org, Coly Li <colyli@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt?
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 16:00:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBjEf5R7X9GaJg2T@eldamar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBilQxLZ4MA4Tg8e@pisco.westfalen.local>

Hi Moritz,

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 01:47:15PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Am Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 05:55:20PM +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > Hi
> > 
> > We got a regression report in Debian after the update from 6.1.133 to
> > 6.1.135. Melvin is reporting that discard/trimm trhough a RAID10 array
> > stalls idefintively. The full report is inlined below and originates
> > from https://bugs.debian.org/1104460 .
> 
> JFTR, we ran into the same problem with a few Wikimedia servers running
> 6.1.135 and RAID 10: The servers started to lock up once fstrim.service
> got started. Full oops messages are available at
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P75746

Thanks for this aditional datapoints. Assuming you wont be able to
thest the other stable series where the commit d05af90d6218
("md/raid10: fix missing discard IO accounting") went in, might you at
least be able to test the 6.1.y branch with the commit reverted again
and manually trigger the issue?

If needed I can provide a test Debian package of 6.1.135 (or 6.1.137)
with the patch reverted. 

Regards,
Salvatore

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <174602441004.174814.6400502946223473449.reportbug@talos.vermwa.re>
2025-04-30 15:55 ` [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-05-05 11:47   ` Moritz Mühlenhoff
2025-05-05 14:00     ` Salvatore Bonaccorso [this message]
2025-05-05 16:02       ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-05-05 18:50         ` Bug#1104460: " Antoine Beaupré
2025-05-05 20:36           ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-05-05 20:59             ` Antoine Beaupré
2025-05-06  1:25               ` Bug#1104460: [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking Yu Kuai
2025-05-06  6:00                 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-05-06 13:12                   ` Antoine Beaupré
2025-05-06  1:11   ` Yu Kuai
2025-05-06  1:19     ` Yu Kuai
2025-05-06 15:16   ` [regression 6.1.y] discard/TRIM through RAID10 blocking (was: Re: Bug#1104460: linux-image-6.1.0-34-powerpc64le: Discard broken) with RAID10: BUG: kernel tried to execute user page (0) - exploit attempt? Melvin Vermeeren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBjEf5R7X9GaJg2T@eldamar.lan \
    --to=carnil@debian.org \
    --cc=1104460@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=colyli@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jmm@inutil.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vermeeren@vermwa.re \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox