Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/gem: Fix race in drm_gem_handle_create_tail()

[Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>]

On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 05:18:13PM +0200, Simona Vetter wrote:
> Object creation is a careful dance where we must guarantee that the
> object is fully constructed before it is visible to other threads, and
> GEM buffer objects are no difference.
> 
> Final publishing happens by calling drm_gem_handle_create(). After
> that the only allowed thing to do is call drm_gem_object_put() because
> a concurrent call to the GEM_CLOSE ioctl with a correctly guessed id
> (which is trivial since we have a linear allocator) can already tear
> down the object again.
> 
> Luckily most drivers get this right, the very few exceptions I've
> pinged the relevant maintainers for. Unfortunately we also need
> drm_gem_handle_create() when creating additional handles for an
> already existing object (e.g. GETFB ioctl or the various bo import
> ioctl), and hence we cannot have a drm_gem_handle_create_and_put() as
> the only exported function to stop these issues from happening.
> 
> Now unfortunately the implementation of drm_gem_handle_create() isn't
> living up to standards: It does correctly finishe object
> initialization at the global level, and hence is safe against a
> concurrent tear down. But it also sets up the file-private aspects of
> the handle, and that part goes wrong: We fully register the object in
> the drm_file.object_idr before calling drm_vma_node_allow() or
> obj->funcs->open, which opens up races against concurrent removal of
> that handle in drm_gem_handle_delete().
> 
> Fix this with the usual two-stage approach of first reserving the
> handle id, and then only registering the object after we've completed
> the file-private setup.
> 
> Jacek reported this with a testcase of concurrently calling GEM_CLOSE
> on a freshly-created object (which also destroys the object), but it
> should be possible to hit this with just additional handles created
> through import or GETFB without completed destroying the underlying
> object with the concurrent GEM_CLOSE ioctl calls.
> 
> Note that the close-side of this race was fixed in f6cd7daecff5 ("drm:
> Release driver references to handle before making it available
> again"), which means a cool 9 years have passed until someone noticed
> that we need to make this symmetry or there's still gaps left :-/
> Without the 2-stage close approach we'd still have a race, therefore
> that's an integral part of this bugfix.
> 
> More importantly, this means we can have NULL pointers behind
> allocated id in our drm_file.object_idr. We need to check for that
> now:
> 
> - drm_gem_handle_delete() checks for ERR_OR_NULL already
> 
> - drm_gem.c:object_lookup() also chekcs for NULL
> 
> - drm_gem_release() should never be called if there's another thread
>   still existing that could call into an IOCTL that creates a new
>   handle, so cannot race. For paranoia I added a NULL check to
>   drm_gem_object_release_handle() though.
> 
> - most drivers (etnaviv, i915, msm) are find because they use
>   idr_find(), which maps both ENOENT and NULL to NULL.
> 
> - drivers using idr_for_each_entry() should also be fine, because
>   idr_get_next does filter out NULL entries and continues the
>   iteration.
> 
> - The same holds for drm_show_memory_stats().
> 
> v2: Use drm_WARN_ON (Thomas)
> 
> Reported-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
> Cc: Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Pushed to drm-misc-fixes, thanks for the reviews.
-Sima

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  include/drm/drm_file.h    |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index bc505d938b3e..1aa9192c4cc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,9 @@ drm_gem_object_release_handle(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
>  	struct drm_file *file_priv = data;
>  	struct drm_gem_object *obj = ptr;
>  
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, !data))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (obj->funcs->close)
>  		obj->funcs->close(obj, file_priv);
>  
> @@ -436,7 +439,7 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,
>  	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
>  	spin_lock(&file_priv->table_lock);
>  
> -	ret = idr_alloc(&file_priv->object_idr, obj, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +	ret = idr_alloc(&file_priv->object_idr, NULL, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  
>  	spin_unlock(&file_priv->table_lock);
>  	idr_preload_end();
> @@ -457,6 +460,11 @@ drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,
>  			goto err_revoke;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* mirrors drm_gem_handle_delete to avoid races */
> +	spin_lock(&file_priv->table_lock);
> +	obj = idr_replace(&file_priv->object_idr, obj, handle);
> +	WARN_ON(obj != NULL);
> +	spin_unlock(&file_priv->table_lock);
>  	*handlep = handle;
>  	return 0;
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> index eab7546aad79..115763799625 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h
> @@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ struct drm_file {
>  	 *
>  	 * Mapping of mm object handles to object pointers. Used by the GEM
>  	 * subsystem. Protected by @table_lock.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that allocated entries might be NULL as a transient state when
> +	 * creating or deleting a handle.
>  	 */
>  	struct idr object_idr;
>  
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
Simona Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch