From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@gentwo.org, rientjes@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, glittao@gmail.com,
jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/slub: Fix cmp_loc_by_count() to return 0 when counts are equal
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 16:53:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK1n_t-V1AlN86JR@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKyjaTUneWQgwsV5@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 01:54:49AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> Hi Vlastimil,
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 07:28:17PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 8/25/25 03:34, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> > > The comparison function cmp_loc_by_count() used for sorting stack trace
> > > locations in debugfs currently returns -1 if a->count > b->count and 1
> > > otherwise. This breaks the antisymmetry property required by sort(),
> > > because when two counts are equal, both cmp(a, b) and cmp(b, a) return
> > > 1.
> >
> > Good catch.
> >
> > > This can lead to undefined or incorrect ordering results. Fix it by
> >
> > Wonder if it can really affect anything in practice other than swapping
> > needlessly some records with an equal count?
> >
> It could result in some elements being incorrectly ordered, similar to
> what happened before in ACPI causing issues with s2idle [1][2]. But in
> this case, the worst impact is just the display order not matching the
> count, so it's not too critical.
Could you give an example where the previous cmp_loc_by_count() code
produces an incorrectly sorted array?
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/70674dc7-5586-4183-8953-8095567e73df@gmail.com
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240701205639.117194-1-visitorckw@gmail.com
>
> > > explicitly returning 0 when the counts are equal, ensuring that the
> > > comparison function follows the expected mathematical properties.
> >
> > Agreed with the cmp_int() suggestion for a v2.
> >
> I'll make that change in v2.
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250825013419.240278-1-visitorckw@gmail.com>
2025-08-25 1:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/slub: Fix cmp_loc_by_count() to return 0 when counts are equal Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-25 14:48 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-25 16:18 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-25 17:12 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-08-25 17:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-25 17:54 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-26 7:53 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-08-28 17:13 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-08-29 2:06 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aK1n_t-V1AlN86JR@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=glittao@gmail.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).