From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Donald Douwsma <ddouwsma@redhat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 00:55:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKwW2gEnQdIdDONk@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250822152137.GE7965@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 08:21:37AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> We only flag corruptions for these two error codes, but ENODATA from the
> block layer means "critical medium error". I take that to mean the
> media has permanently lost whatever was persisted there, right?
It can also be a write error. But yes, it's what EIO indidcates in
general. Which is why I really think we should be doing something like
the patch below. But as I don't have the time to fully shephed this
I'm not trying to block this hack, even if I think the issue will
continue to byte us in the future.
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index f9ef3b2a332a..0252faf038aa 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1290,6 +1290,22 @@ xfs_bwrite(
return error;
}
+static int
+xfs_buf_bio_status(
+ struct bio *bio)
+{
+ switch (bio->bi_status) {
+ case BLK_STS_OK:
+ return 0;
+ case BLK_STS_NOSPC:
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ case BLK_STS_OFFLINE:
+ return -ENODEV;
+ default:
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+}
+
static void
xfs_buf_bio_end_io(
struct bio *bio)
@@ -1297,7 +1313,7 @@ xfs_buf_bio_end_io(
struct xfs_buf *bp = bio->bi_private;
if (bio->bi_status)
- xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status));
+ xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, xfs_buf_bio_status(bio));
else if ((bp->b_flags & XBF_WRITE) && (bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC) &&
XFS_TEST_ERROR(false, bp->b_mount, XFS_ERRTAG_BUF_IOERROR))
xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 21:36 [PATCH] xfs: do not propagate ENODATA disk errors into xattr code Eric Sandeen
2025-08-22 15:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-25 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-08-25 15:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2025-08-25 15:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-27 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-27 15:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKwW2gEnQdIdDONk@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=ddouwsma@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).