From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: "Subramaniam, Sujana" <sujana.subramaniam@sap.com>
Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"akendo@akendo.eu" <akendo@akendo.eu>
Subject: Re: Backport of Patch CVE-2025-21751 to kernel 6.12.43
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:34:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKzI1g0ixwmI_KQM@laps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <GVXPR02MB8399DEBA4EA261A5F173FE268B3EA@GVXPR02MB8399.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 01:12:27PM +0000, Subramaniam, Sujana wrote:
> Dear Kernel Developers,
>
>
> Hereby we attach patch backported from kernel 6.13 (as proposed by Greg
> k-h on the full disclosure mailing list) to 6.12 for CVE-2025-21751
> vulnerability.
>
>
> This patch was tested on metal and virtual machines and rolled out in
> production.
>
>
> I hope patch is sufficient for cherry-pick. Please let us know if
> something has to be updated/modified.
Hi Sujana,
Thanks for the backports! There are a few issues that needs to be addressed first:
1. Every stable backport must reference the upstream commit being backported.
The patch description must contain the line "commit XXXX upstream" where XXXX
is the full SHA-1 of the mainline commit. This is mandatory per
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst section 2. Without this
reference, we cannot verify what is being backported or whether it has been
properly tested upstream.
2. Stable patches cannot be submitted as attachments, especially not
base64-encoded ones. All patches must be sent inline in the email body using
git send-email. This allows for proper review, commenting, and application by
maintainers. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst section 7 "No
MIME, no links, no compression, no attachments. Just plain text" and
Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for configuration guidance.
3. Missing original commit message: The patch must include the complete
original upstream commit message, including the problem description, solution
explanation, and all tags (Signed-off-by, Reviewed-by, etc.) from the original
commit. You cannot replace this with your own description. The original commit
message documents why the change was made and is essential for understanding
the fix. See Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst which states
backports should be "equivalent" to the upstream commit or a subset thereof.
Please resubmit following the documented process. You can find examples of
properly formatted stable backports on the stable mailing list archives.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-25 13:12 Backport of Patch CVE-2025-21751 to kernel 6.12.43 Subramaniam, Sujana
2025-08-25 20:20 ` Greg KH
2025-08-25 20:34 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKzI1g0ixwmI_KQM@laps \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=akendo@akendo.eu \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sujana.subramaniam@sap.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox