From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBD8B2417C2 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 23:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761520583; cv=none; b=PltUWPZzVotFcLU7xt8A/x6aEGj7kTQjZK56OjCbkIrNwrw2nvXpJXHDJVC/rRFHf5W7Aov36tdz+xir3YlgqdomG8guo3ZrrdbouL28JBaPD2chnhqFyn6zCdwXqF9enjJmrtnpfzS4Tgd05jqLJmEr8A90KeCeJpHqy7+57po= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761520583; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KQ6oL4hiz75C/A8/vFj2v/R+XXo7kpXKDEDVyBnk9ug=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oxm+QJY6n4bqlOGD975htm6cy0B2X8KagdvlVgBzu96o/XT09PrDI5e5G01hylQLUokiS4rz28Y+qyjV70DRcYI0J0ZJs++GANuCDFDUJCCiBaj5tfZxNLos5W371BbDyQtnphwzJA9emMitr0n0zWMHQl+m4qtjR0KzjcqKC+8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=RPJDCQYR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="RPJDCQYR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761520580; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TM9g2J61qUgy8rn11tUgr2Kr+gynrxk9ajK18D17/SY=; b=RPJDCQYRhVLFsadMNhgBG19pz3iarfNc8xA24kPqVsz/1YivTlvNktdaKCQ9kaIOcLUxXM pCRsFOPGobAH6gKDiNfJSsJEkHxiKLSO3YYgGLBqyuydxaeMSmP/R5WNguJ5yYYrxc2k39 qHYjdrBoNgur430TBoSwBdqDK4cq4uw= Received: from mail-qk1-f199.google.com (mail-qk1-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-483-Kd_LMUUGOBeUGGIC9bJTaw-1; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 19:16:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Kd_LMUUGOBeUGGIC9bJTaw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Kd_LMUUGOBeUGGIC9bJTaw_1761520579 Received: by mail-qk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8a2594fa114so256970685a.0 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 16:16:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761520579; x=1762125379; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TM9g2J61qUgy8rn11tUgr2Kr+gynrxk9ajK18D17/SY=; b=j/InOn1xKs3HjxFLBy0wx0lMzQAUAYcciUWUd8iwA9sE7bKTIRowMPy7qd4nrjXBiO 4zR3F9GTKotmWkTZ2XPdxROxhZVUiuORwiRsQHn3623OQ8mW37NdJ6TF7CBXZdm+t8aI hxAzWnZMv/cThYNMuh6sDEmVz+UQr4xfo7uyvWyUUs1FjkdGXXADSJAh6gI+jQgKcX1U MWjnksHOHOdAU53hkVEZX58umIF3VxQcvB0b0F+QRYr1faDHLwHdBEX9fBlJuWjqz5tA WsRCW9iXZmSDEJmqIRNFuvXBRXyqUJeHZXeiTX3QDstCYGPXQiRfGhPURVXl/KmCJVru 6+sQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXelssXfxnzRDszgZPqnih5wYZZQ2IJrEJCAmsmZqaPXL7zki1EeRm05WrCmume2+jI/jEaLP0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxzDPFQql8t39Lyedphq5o5Uttzt4skq0QTjTGmOvaV9dKpb64F 1q8OpNjRSKvFQvJosFsbdMllqywbi6UWwKmCeG6pT9onO2pca9Lr1iGfTEvfmbex5iKDsE9eEjR lSKgfUh+HAVv87yJkT2RleXlyHREbcmGVjas3dx396c7t1dqlcWfGVWIuvQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu3ka3gYVRTpIXPfYCCN2/xzUV0HEw8hUVqpq+ugVH8EDNc5eKxjdUB9zcfjOB 7YlbpsNbDxtrFTV8nZxLSgVU8z78F07N2S9jXe5QkGbsW8SmUw/GQy0KyFkzZuiG6QBo48l/SO5 dkTHZbxxH2+5SW12iR5hv2JPOi5Vaa5f4mLPrG5L3qAG799wqG+W6jpfAhG2OTfuZAIhCQLUW+Z cWckVADB7Uao399Xc1m/lpRZuFJ0Pkgrvp6Xrz5Ge+Dkoc58yHEo+ifOfyTkb+h3ZZ8cvJf0q0O xnFWbNFUyFoCRsjTtwaHlrT19YF24p2oyicWCcFFgCsCYjNROR37A7wwK1sBg/WGBgP/GEECStU sYiVLg7DyhaQ+BYjKSOusPfT1WeYb X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4454:b0:809:b21:5421 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-89da1bae914mr1370443685a.39.1761520578743; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 16:16:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE0exW7QsnW96XJU3LfmVTRq5OXRYKfDNXF9pTY84ykGNprSECOl2LKm846J2PimjM64qIFow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4454:b0:809:b21:5421 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-89da1bae914mr1370441885a.39.1761520578329; Sun, 26 Oct 2025 16:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2600:382:7702:71bf:259:17c7:d468:3f55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-89f2421fc6fsm435746185a.9.2025.10.26.16.16.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 26 Oct 2025 16:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 19:16:13 -0400 From: Brian Masney To: Sasha Levin Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , Peng Fan , mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.17-6.12] clk: scmi: migrate round_rate() to determine_rate() Message-ID: References: <20251026144958.26750-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20251026144958.26750-39-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251026144958.26750-39-sashal@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.14 (2025-02-20) Hi Sasha, On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Brian Masney > > [ Upstream commit 80cb2b6edd8368f7e1e8bf2f66aabf57aa7de4b7 ] > > This driver implements both the determine_rate() and round_rate() clk > ops, and the round_rate() clk ops is deprecated. When both are defined, > clk_core_determine_round_nolock() from the clk core will only use the > determine_rate() clk ops. > > The existing scmi_clk_determine_rate() is a noop implementation that > lets the firmware round the rate as appropriate. Drop the existing > determine_rate implementation and convert the existing round_rate() > implementation over to determine_rate(). > > scmi_clk_determine_rate() was added recently when the clock parent > support was added, so it's not expected that this change will regress > anything. > > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla > Reviewed-by: Peng Fan > Tested-by: Peng Fan #i.MX95-19x19-EVK > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Please drop this commit from all stable backports. Thanks, Brian