From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A1426FD9A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769523257; cv=none; b=FtrD2OmKW6iNqvxFo/fn/1m2JY8k1s7Jup6jp++J/N25L+GUSkjw7IiDxoMkWcUzbvT4C3/bmz3XaIo4gklnmIVpWxgKSjsV25ihoTHnNURsJPmR2nfmOiAksPmkll0vy2oc8+il471FCMBc6fR0advMAVKhKd0UL5HRL8ucA1w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769523257; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jRcA7Mg/uP3nRyG38zgih/EHZEvaiCITPi9rxccuT2g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aOyiLImi5QApfPDo8QQipwrvWgpEsR33zhTPEpN7HGlBdcClxvPMwSRnSu+j/QsUmJYWMGuRHViGR8AXyBL7tUf2tEG5G5sAw0FoUeUCNjTu4Sx8uNRCJrkeUA9vE7HpcPgS3SRKDVVY00h7Zp4DieedCtS60691SpwLqagf8No= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=rCmqxUW3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="rCmqxUW3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=jRcA7Mg/uP3nRyG38zgih/EHZEvaiCITPi9rxccuT2g=; b=rCmqxUW3nBsbC4L+ESHyPXMkqb nsAQSILaGDun/Le4vcshGpFlE2vboXsVs7/njjhS4k8GdwVIRP2hOgk1rwaWca1uZkLgTP5KIfRso GwqzlOke+QkG99TM+t/B2v5kR4QK3mZDTAc4Eyg6+oWqnv4UsDitUHBrsRgLVibRwzJ8kE6v6kv9H CcGKU4sdablWVsu8gCXGqANy7dwgr98yaDa90nOWbiKVTF7+aZXXZkKQ4bAfk2F9p6fqme6DCCxrI ProLieQFIU/83fZOi5j9UTI7yW7X9ej52SPQII3DNhW9bxCUJA/q6jbBJ0nbOJev7FUmM9aHDxirq ySBjhp2w==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vkjpT-00000007XbQ-2RCz; Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:14:03 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:14:03 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, apopple@nvidia.com, byungchul@sk.com, david@kernel.org, gourry@gourry.net, jannh@google.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, liam.howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, riel@surriel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ziy@nvidia.com Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] migrate: correct lock ordering for hugetlb file folios" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree Message-ID: References: <2026012707-hazard-unmanaged-494d@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2026012707-hazard-unmanaged-494d@gregkh> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 02:09:07PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. The 6.6 patch applies fine to 6.1