From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: cpsw_new: Execute ndo_set_rx_mode callback in a work queue
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:32:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXr_DNapxeHpuWt1@pek-khao-d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127190836.6a420768@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1471 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 07:08:36PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:02:07 +0800 Kevin Hao wrote:
> > To resolve this issue, we opt to execute the actual processing within
> > a work queue, following the approach used by the icssg-prueth driver.
>
> Code looks good now, but why are you creating a workqueue for this one
> work? Can't you use the system wq and just cancel it sync where you had
> the wq destroy?
This implementation was adapted from the icssg-prueth driver. After reviewing
the git history, I found no explicit rationale for using a dedicated workqueue.
In my opinion, if we were to use the system wq and rely on cancel_work_sync()
before unregister_netdev(), a race condition could arise between these two calls.
Specifically, cpsw_ndo_set_rx_mode_work() might be scheduled during this interval
and run after the net device is unregistered, leading to a use-after-free bug.
While reviewing the code, I noticed that in the current implementation, we may
need to move the destroy_workqueue() call after unregister_netdev(). Otherwise,
there is a risk of encountering a use-after-free bug related to the dedicated workqueue.
>
> BTW you're fixing drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c I think
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c has an identical bug, no?
Yes, as noted in the patch comment area, I plan to address the same issue in
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c once this patch is approved.
Thanks,
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 8:02 [PATCH net v3] net: cpsw_new: Execute ndo_set_rx_mode callback in a work queue Kevin Hao
2026-01-28 3:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-01-29 6:32 ` Kevin Hao [this message]
2026-01-30 2:31 ` Kevin Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXr_DNapxeHpuWt1@pek-khao-d3 \
--to=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox