Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Do not run kernel-doc when building external modules

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 11:10:37AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Feb 2026, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > Since kernel-doc is a part of Kbuild,
> > > all dependent libraries should exist under scripts/.
> > 
> > Huh. I've always wondered why all the Kbuild makefiles are placed in
> > scripts/, which appears to be a haphazard collection of, well, scripts
> > and tools. But then you also have tools/.
> 
> From the kbuild perspective, as Masahiro mentioned, every tooling
> related to kernel builds, kbuild or kconfig should be placed in
> scripts/.  The tools/ subtree isn't using kbuild; rules, definitionas
> and other expectations that are valid for kbuild may not be true in
> tools/, cp. commit 6e6ef2da3a28f [1].
> 
> Unfortunately, there _are_ things in tools/ that are required for kernel
> builds (e.g. objtool), but there is no consent on moving these parts out
> of the tools/ subtree [2].
> 
> > I've followed the kernel-doc refactoring from the sidelines, commenting
> > on some things, but it never crossed my mind the build shouldn't depend
> > on something outside of scripts/. (That's what I'm inferring here
> > anyway.) And apparently that thought didn't occur to a lot of other
> > people either, with even more kernel experience than myself.
> 
> Yes, I also saw the changes fly by but did not think about the
> implications.
> 
> > Sounds like the kernel config and build system would deserve a top-level
> > directory like build/ or kbuild/, which collects everything needed for
> > the build, nothing more, nothing less. Because scripts/ is not *that*.
> 
> Well, sounds straight forward at first, but where should we make the cut
> between kbuild and non-kbuild?  I admit that there are some scripts
> below scripts/ that I'd rather label as "contrib", but I don't think
> that these are too much.

There are all sorts of stuff there. Just documentation has 15 scripts
that was either sitting there or were written directly at tools/docs,
as part of the discussion process of moving things out of it. Several
of them belongs to in-kernel-tree build chain.

Just my two cents, but I guess a kbuild/ and/or tools/kbuild directory
makes sense on my eyes. Yet, I wouldn't mix it with the documentation
build itself.

> 
> > I understand all of this may be a historical accident, and possibly too
> > painful to fix now, but is any of this documented anywhere either?
> 
> No, I am afraid it isn't.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Nicolas
> 
> 
> [1]: https://git.kernel.org/kbuild/c/6e6ef2da3a28f
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kbuild/1551764896-8453-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com/

-- 
Thanks,
Mauro