From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC9AE37F754; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 23:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771889152; cv=none; b=Rz3yJc/gBbQmFbvt5a8vScylD4sai0ttBIieIg+0UZ2FqC+I3uEuuB6use3O/v3E+iLQxjZxWMbaMRWMrO10q/GTM8i4ZUSs35xkabEP/tkojD5zJsOlIHAcn+xrg153VcE3H2bd3bTQUwRpHV+LRjL492QaI4grHQyMYpmrPY0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771889152; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xRhWMBJc69H7kSWKh+9yxb7RfL3YJCE6ag8m7utF3xk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jUIObWjPq4uNxY7b0macbc/3OzJIekQz5/gzeMI324/VQgr5UZJiXQ66nuWOOjfbPVz2Q1u5LspJMMu17vp4xGiL/7re0JCb5vSzskM6Qtep5AXhI1Edz614dUxrV0h3Sq3uQ7UOe/lRawFzc5KjoP87xqBgSIqG0uB73txtX7U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=KYwpBIMA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="KYwpBIMA" Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id C8A7560551; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:25:46 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1771889146; bh=tafzOtZHTxptFE1I7lT6iV4uK0bdXcdtrOiJabPtAK0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KYwpBIMAjsd7AF8JVRtCIOaxrV2iqk8pRkvtK4FfDXBC27r90C87DP+XfV+oDp6zU fQL2tM/uPbHcfKBko/FEQFJ/HlDfl5woD5fidba+PwaFjPfLN704WIlssS8eeJ0+L1 jvRtMxKWB+yVDIHOecQfaphvOvBbCjqrQEEI2B/9LuJbENTWl230nq9TM6s6J+AzFv XMIEsqa16vus7vXjeoBZusWmRAoV9NpSlc+wY6DHbc0pC4WAH583NlKWobU4E0dJ45 t7p8M/0WvqmKqhsZ14A9VCH+nTTGQ5aSo5LQelGskyHcxuCR/lX6vCauF9AapfqnKd wR245p9CgUkHw== Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:25:44 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, Phil Sutter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman Subject: Re: Patch "netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: check for partial overlaps in anonymous sets" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree Message-ID: References: <20260221170938.4180389-1-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 06:26:20PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Sasha Levin wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: check for partial overlaps in anonymous sets > > > > to the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > I'm curious, why was this patch picked up for all te stable branches? > > Pablo, whats your take, is it worth the risk? I would also wait a bit for this fix to roll over the newer kernels. No rush to get this to -stable IMO.