From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: vbabka@kernel.org
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hao.li@linux.dev,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
shicenci@gmail.com, cl@gentwo.org, rientjes@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
surenb@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: fix an incorrect check in obj_exts_alloc_size()
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 12:25:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa-PQBn5d0-U-sKg@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a25d83b-c6ea-4230-a89d-1f496b91764c@kernel.org>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 03:00:17PM +0100, vbabka@kernel.org wrote:
> On 3/9/26 08:22, Harry Yoo wrote:
> > obj_exts_alloc_size() prevents recursive allocation of slabobj_ext
> > array from the same cache, to avoid creating slabs that are never freed.
> >
> > There is one mistake that returns the original size when memory
> > allocation profiling is disabled. The assumption was that
> > memcg-triggered slabobj_ext allocation is always served from
> > KMALLOC_CGROUP type. But this is wrong [1]: when the caller specifies
> > both __GFP_RECLAIMABLE and __GFP_ACCOUNT with SLUB_TINY enabled, the
> > allocation is served from normal kmalloc. This is because kmalloc_type()
> > prioritizes __GFP_RECLAIMABLE over __GFP_ACCOUNT, and SLUB_TINY aliases
> > KMALLOC_RECLAIM with KMALLOC_NORMAL.
>
> Hm that's suboptimal (leads to sparsely used obj_exts in normal kmalloc
> slabs) and maybe separately from this hotfix we could make sure that with
> SLUB_TINY, __GFP_ACCOUNT is preferred going forward?
To be honest, I don't a have strong opinion on that.
Is grouping by mobility (for anti-fragmentation less) important on
SLUB_TINY systems?
> > As a result, the recursion guard is bypassed and the problematic slabs
> > can be created. Fix this by removing the mem_alloc_profiling_enabled()
> > check entirely. The remaining is_kmalloc_normal() check is still
> > sufficient to detect whether the cache is of KMALLOC_NORMAL type and
> > avoid bumping the size if it's not.
> >
> > Without SLUB_TINY, no functional change intended.
> > With SLUB_TINY, allocations with __GFP_ACCOUNT|__GFP_RECLAIMABLE
> > now allocate a larger array if the sizes equal.
> >
> > Reported-by: Zw Tang <shicenci@gmail.com>
> > Fixes: 280ea9c3154b ("mm/slab: avoid allocating slabobj_ext array from its own slab")
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAPHJ_VKuMKSke8b11AZQw1PTSFN4n2C0gFxC6xGOG0ZLHgPmnA@mail.gmail.com
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
>
> Added to slab/for-next-fixes, thanks!
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <aa5NmA25QsFDMhof@hyeyoo>
2026-03-09 7:22 ` [PATCH] mm/slab: fix an incorrect check in obj_exts_alloc_size() Harry Yoo
2026-03-09 14:00 ` vbabka
2026-03-10 3:25 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-03-10 10:06 ` vbabka
2026-03-10 3:29 ` Harry Yoo
2026-03-10 3:40 ` Zw Tang
2026-03-10 10:02 ` vbabka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa-PQBn5d0-U-sKg@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shicenci@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox