public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mte: Allow PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS access to the zero page
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:56:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa94d2b9-d2f1-04fd-7cfe-8a1ab078e5c3@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210210180316.23654-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com>



On 2/10/21 6:03 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS) implementation checks whether the user
> page has valid tags (mapped with PROT_MTE) by testing the PG_mte_tagged
> page flag. If this bit is cleared, ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS) returns
> -EIO.
> 
> A newly created (PROT_MTE) mapping points to the zero page which had its
> tags zeroed during cpu_enable_mte(). If there were no prior writes to
> this mapping, ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS) fails with -EIO since the zero
> page does not have the PG_mte_tagged flag set.
> 
> Set PG_mte_tagged on the zero page when its tags are cleared during
> boot. In addition, to avoid ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS) succeeding on
> !PROT_MTE mappings pointing to the zero page, change the
> __access_remote_tags() check to (vm_flags & VM_MTE) instead of
> PG_mte_tagged.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Fixes: 34bfeea4a9e9 ("arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10.x
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> The fix is actually checking VM_MTE instead of PG_mte_tagged in
> __access_remote_tags() but I added the WARN_ON(!PG_mte_tagged) and
> setting the flag on the zero page in case we break this assumption in
> the future.
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 6 +-----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c        | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index e99eddec0a46..3e6331b64932 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1701,16 +1701,12 @@ static void bti_enable(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
>  static void cpu_enable_mte(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
>  {
> -	static bool cleared_zero_page = false;
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear the tags in the zero page. This needs to be done via the
>  	 * linear map which has the Tagged attribute.
>  	 */
> -	if (!cleared_zero_page) {
> -		cleared_zero_page = true;
> +	if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &ZERO_PAGE(0)->flags))
>  		mte_clear_page_tags(lm_alias(empty_zero_page));
> -	}
>  
>  	kasan_init_hw_tags_cpu();
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> index dc9ada64feed..80b62fe49dcf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> @@ -329,11 +329,12 @@ static int __access_remote_tags(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>  		 * would cause the existing tags to be cleared if the page
>  		 * was never mapped with PROT_MTE.
>  		 */
> -		if (!test_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags)) {
> +		if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE)) {
>  			ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  			put_page(page);
>  			break;
>  		}
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!test_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags));
>  

Nit: I would live a white line before WARN_ON_ONCE() to improve readability and
maybe transform it in WARN_ONCE() with a message (alternatively a comment on
top) based on what you are explaining in the commit message.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>

>  		/* limit access to the end of the page */
>  		offset = offset_in_page(addr);
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10 18:03 [PATCH] arm64: mte: Allow PTRACE_PEEKMTETAGS access to the zero page Catalin Marinas
2021-02-10 18:52 ` Luis Machado
2021-02-11 10:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-11 10:56 ` Vincenzo Frascino [this message]
2021-02-12 16:45 ` Catalin Marinas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-16 18:56 vivek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa94d2b9-d2f1-04fd-7cfe-8a1ab078e5c3@arm.com \
    --to=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox