From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Paulo Andrade <pandrade@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAILED: Patch "x86/uprobes: Fix XOL allocation failure for 32-bit tasks" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 10:45:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaVcKHr3GMmOIdvM@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260301011537.1669125-1-sashal@kernel.org>
On 02/28, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> The patch below does not apply to the 6.18-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
I never know how to react to "failed to apply to stabe" emails. I am going
to send [PATCH 6.18.y] in reply to this email.
Is it OK?
Oleg.
> Thanks,
> Sasha
>
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>
> From d55c571e4333fac71826e8db3b9753fadfbead6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2026 16:00:37 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/uprobes: Fix XOL allocation failure for 32-bit tasks
>
> This script
>
> #!/usr/bin/bash
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space
>
> echo 'void main(void) {}' > TEST.c
>
> # -fcf-protection to ensure that the 1st endbr32 insn can't be emulated
> gcc -m32 -fcf-protection=branch TEST.c -o test
>
> bpftrace -e 'uprobe:./test:main {}' -c ./test
>
> "hangs", the probed ./test task enters an endless loop.
>
> The problem is that with randomize_va_space == 0
> get_unmapped_area(TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE) called by xol_add_vma() can not
> just return the "addr == TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE" hint, this addr is used
> by the stack vma.
>
> arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown() doesn't take TIF_ADDR32 into account and
> in_32bit_syscall() is false, this leads to info.high_limit > TASK_SIZE.
> vm_unmapped_area() happily returns the high address > TASK_SIZE and then
> get_unmapped_area() returns -ENOMEM after the "if (addr > TASK_SIZE - len)"
> check.
>
> handle_swbp() doesn't report this failure (probably it should) and silently
> restarts the probed insn. Endless loop.
>
> I think that the right fix should change the x86 get_unmapped_area() paths
> to rely on TIF_ADDR32 rather than in_32bit_syscall(). Note also that if
> CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI=y, in_x32_syscall() falsely returns true in this case
> because ->orig_ax = -1.
>
> But we need a simple fix for -stable, so this patch just sets TS_COMPAT if
> the probed task is 32-bit to make in_ia32_syscall() true.
>
> Fixes: 1b028f784e8c ("x86/mm: Introduce mmap_compat_base() for 32-bit mmap()")
> Reported-by: Paulo Andrade <pandrade@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aV5uldEvV7pb4RA8@redhat.com/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aWO7Fdxn39piQnxu@redhat.com
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/uprobes.h | 1 +
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 10 +++++++---
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 7be8e361ca55b..619dddf54424e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -1823,3 +1823,27 @@ bool is_uprobe_at_func_entry(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> return false;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> +unsigned long arch_uprobe_get_xol_area(void)
> +{
> + struct thread_info *ti = current_thread_info();
> + unsigned long vaddr;
> +
> + /*
> + * HACK: we are not in a syscall, but x86 get_unmapped_area() paths
> + * ignore TIF_ADDR32 and rely on in_32bit_syscall() to calculate
> + * vm_unmapped_area_info.high_limit.
> + *
> + * The #ifdef above doesn't cover the CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI=y case,
> + * but in this case in_32bit_syscall() -> in_x32_syscall() always
> + * (falsely) returns true because ->orig_ax == -1.
> + */
> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32))
> + ti->status |= TS_COMPAT;
> + vaddr = get_unmapped_area(NULL, TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0);
> + ti->status &= ~TS_COMPAT;
> +
> + return vaddr;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index ee3d36eda45dd..f548fea2adec8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ extern void arch_uprobe_clear_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
> extern void arch_uprobe_init_state(struct mm_struct *mm);
> extern void handle_syscall_uprobe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long bp_vaddr);
> extern void arch_uprobe_optimize(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, unsigned long vaddr);
> +extern unsigned long arch_uprobe_get_xol_area(void);
> #else /* !CONFIG_UPROBES */
> struct uprobes_state {
> };
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index a7d7d83ca1d78..dfbce021fb027 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1694,6 +1694,12 @@ static const struct vm_special_mapping xol_mapping = {
> .mremap = xol_mremap,
> };
>
> +unsigned long __weak arch_uprobe_get_xol_area(void)
> +{
> + /* Try to map as high as possible, this is only a hint. */
> + return get_unmapped_area(NULL, TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> /* Slot allocation for XOL */
> static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
> {
> @@ -1709,9 +1715,7 @@ static int xol_add_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, struct xol_area *area)
> }
>
> if (!area->vaddr) {
> - /* Try to map as high as possible, this is only a hint. */
> - area->vaddr = get_unmapped_area(NULL, TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE,
> - PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0);
> + area->vaddr = arch_uprobe_get_xol_area();
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(area->vaddr)) {
> ret = area->vaddr;
> goto fail;
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-01 1:15 FAILED: Patch "x86/uprobes: Fix XOL allocation failure for 32-bit tasks" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree Sasha Levin
2026-03-02 9:45 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-03-02 9:45 ` [PATCH 6.18.y] x86/uprobes: Fix XOL allocation failure for 32-bit tasks Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaVcKHr3GMmOIdvM@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pandrade@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox