public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking
@ 2026-03-02  0:39 Nam Cao
  2026-03-03 10:13 ` Nilay Shroff
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nam Cao @ 2026-03-02  0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin,
	Christophe Leroy, Nilay Shroff, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
  Cc: Nam Cao, stable

The per-device MSI allocation calculation in pseries_irq_domain_alloc()
is clearly wrong. It can still happen to work when nr_irqs is 1.

Correct it.

Fixes: c0215e2d72de ("powerpc/pseries: Fix MSI-X allocation failure when quota is exceeded")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
index 64ffc6476ad6..8285b9a29fbf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int pseries_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq
 					      &pseries_msi_irq_chip, pseries_dev);
 	}
 
-	pseries_dev->msi_used++;
+	pseries_dev->msi_used += nr_irqs;
 	return 0;
 
 out:
-- 
2.47.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking
  2026-03-02  0:39 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking Nam Cao
@ 2026-03-03 10:13 ` Nilay Shroff
  2026-03-03 13:49 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
  2026-03-11  2:14 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nilay Shroff @ 2026-03-03 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nam Cao, Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin,
	Christophe Leroy, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel
  Cc: stable

On 3/2/26 6:09 AM, Nam Cao wrote:
> The per-device MSI allocation calculation in pseries_irq_domain_alloc()
> is clearly wrong. It can still happen to work when nr_irqs is 1.
> 
> Correct it.
> 
> Fixes: c0215e2d72de ("powerpc/pseries: Fix MSI-X allocation failure when quota is exceeded")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> index 64ffc6476ad6..8285b9a29fbf 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int pseries_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq
>   					      &pseries_msi_irq_chip, pseries_dev);
>   	}
>   
> -	pseries_dev->msi_used++;
> +	pseries_dev->msi_used += nr_irqs;
>   	return 0;
>   
>   out:

Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by : Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking
  2026-03-02  0:39 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking Nam Cao
  2026-03-03 10:13 ` Nilay Shroff
@ 2026-03-03 13:49 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
  2026-03-11  2:14 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh J Salgaonkar @ 2026-03-03 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nam Cao
  Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin,
	Christophe Leroy, Nilay Shroff, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel,
	stable

On 2026-03-02 01:39:48 Mon, Nam Cao wrote:
> The per-device MSI allocation calculation in pseries_irq_domain_alloc()
> is clearly wrong. It can still happen to work when nr_irqs is 1.
> 
> Correct it.
> 
> Fixes: c0215e2d72de ("powerpc/pseries: Fix MSI-X allocation failure when quota is exceeded")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> index 64ffc6476ad6..8285b9a29fbf 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int pseries_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq
>  					      &pseries_msi_irq_chip, pseries_dev);
>  	}
>  
> -	pseries_dev->msi_used++;
> +	pseries_dev->msi_used += nr_irqs;

Yeah, msi_used was wronlgy incremented only once while allocating
nr_irqs interrupts from parent domain. Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks,
-Mahesh.

>  	return 0;
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

-- 
Mahesh J Salgaonkar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking
  2026-03-02  0:39 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking Nam Cao
  2026-03-03 10:13 ` Nilay Shroff
  2026-03-03 13:49 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
@ 2026-03-11  2:14 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2026-03-11  2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy, Nilay Shroff,
	linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Nam Cao
  Cc: stable

On Mon, 02 Mar 2026 01:39:48 +0100, Nam Cao wrote:
> The per-device MSI allocation calculation in pseries_irq_domain_alloc()
> is clearly wrong. It can still happen to work when nr_irqs is 1.
> 
> Correct it.
> 
> 

Applied to powerpc/fixes.

[1/1] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/35e4f2a17eb40288f9bcdb09549fa04a63a96279

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-11  2:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-02  0:39 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Correct MSI allocation tracking Nam Cao
2026-03-03 10:13 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-03-03 13:49 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2026-03-11  2:14 ` Madhavan Srinivasan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox