From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D24E2459C9; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 13:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772889657; cv=none; b=u+qbchLkuCuzd3+a/nMtg59F/kDj8oTIm54DoNOHmnKX68lb2tD/qnMWzZnn3Ws9DZqRDkL6sPFFOaaIqUs9O0iwGZtHTQ2XnQi+39/5IBE/2ULpthT+Y7pLDW1am7imQo3UDf+Mz77EIqlFLeypSH8A8WyCveizdWQIybDTpB8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772889657; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YyXFFIh/LzC8eDlQk2HzFl1QnoQ5WC9wW81N/VC2YLc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ovgUekKzi8kK+LyRKDkj3sqW3jsKHE2krxQEe/WO9gltIx+2JOW98O6/EGY0lMyTTcoe2Ib7ipIE67HK1sAzIRF6oilPAYJpjsG7P8pQErbciFwg0NHm5gmp5Wop5zVMtVooEylC0iRbFApkqzVOKUPae8ntAvtxzdgSAUve/fQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GdMsnb5D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GdMsnb5D" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BD07C2BC86; Sat, 7 Mar 2026 13:20:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772889656; bh=YyXFFIh/LzC8eDlQk2HzFl1QnoQ5WC9wW81N/VC2YLc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GdMsnb5DQvd7xSPyJDYUCbU7SrRkxSAPQdzAjBlyPftcwJuBozODRtYUBIC5Qsqa4 x2udf1m9NbaEW/Fl44s6NDMygm0FmhJ07b3REvuekXShYWDJwaryF3glay4oeFdlOM WV8LTnDmhUYHA8wLVBeoSbOkpeQqOEcH478IuakdSOCCx/oxTXJqJ3/D1zLAtFdetY F1+Dw9R6lMHk1MltvcCTZDYqv6qiZ8H4lONEE2eSxEHPHNS1UYf/l/633zMC3xe3+t Zv8eeQ632FA1lbIPzPCdWlTHXFNvJ48a5erzjx+9/R3+A4YXqFOyIuTIjPVCBbdb0W Ru2w59Mop1mMA== Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 08:20:55 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Ben Hutchings Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@nabladev.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, sr@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/334] 5.10.252-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20260302161007.2523181-1-sashal@kernel.org> <992df439ca66e562353d285642c6ab8e1c69e2e6.camel@decadent.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <992df439ca66e562353d285642c6ab8e1c69e2e6.camel@decadent.org.uk> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 08:19:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >On Mon, 2026-03-02 at 11:10 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.252 release. >> There are 334 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. > >And yet they were not. I don't think we ever did post the series for -rc2+, did we? I guess I need to remove the message... >> If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. > >I can some issues, such as these feature additions being backported: > >[...] >> Rui Feng (1): >> misc: rtsx: Add SD Express mode support for RTS5261 >[...] >> Ulf Hansson (1): >> mmc: core: Initial support for SD express card/host >[...] > >supposedly as dependencies of: > >> Matthew Schwartz (1): >> mmc: rtsx_pci_sdmmc: increase power-on settling delay to 5ms > >But it doesn't depend on them. And it also got reverted in this same >series. So backporting the "dependencies" just introduced risk with no >benefit. > >Meanwhile, the stable-specific regressions in recent 5.10.y stable >releases (affecting ARM memset64() and IPv6 tunnels) were not addressed >in 5.10.252. Thanks for the heads-up, I've queued up both fixes. -- Thanks, Sasha