From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D283BE151; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773310011; cv=none; b=VfprJZpxqDxlBhH09SNJCqHA5ZUdbTlo14DowBws5aTpGfgyZpP9d8JLvR0v9yxxqMibZ9rgR57ba6FaaGTpG8NS1G/aofD/j0740uBgcQSPhil1TtUR47eppWOCLXB4Ksuux1g4Cc4lEtkLQof8B8Uqlx323D44JQy2ubQ6TcQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773310011; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ig08MQfGmiZ30wv+QHeTuTjV9DP7WANS0SB5wgLfghw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PVdUJKe0c7quPhrMbFZICxtOEz5hZ5LkKFM1/xXSxL7d56JhQ3W0ncV8bIAtBZVztvf0CSIvQNz/97kDbCPocD+pSOkGbo0j1x/43XsI1qv3/xAbiPNbk6SgHrSvCUzBg2xxa7U+YogNFhHUOk/0z9LVVlid3VkRtHTRlzCoCTY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=n56DtOJR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="n56DtOJR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78F76C4CEF7; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:06:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773310010; bh=ig08MQfGmiZ30wv+QHeTuTjV9DP7WANS0SB5wgLfghw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=n56DtOJRRTVspn3kUvvfLAgF5zqsneMu92fpX/osjlLLl2IFC3bDNW0LeSLS1V5jz oVmU26DS9ghymR5PlMKbvHJ42wgNfXL8D2/w0W1OZIKb1pHacv9hP1W3K3OkODktMl aHXhkgs3yBM7LO6zQPU2sc6ts2sQSIqkUU6GVLsmyxgHtz0+6yhrX4CtWoAd/nyfkh 33r3vIYE0uLJ8V/6cnfPJAqjB8v88s9BJMaaxAHzfcJjW8nnxI3bk2QjMD5C1167X0 MKST7J4wJMFcocGB+OM9NjKerj0Sh3pcmn0J7l1D0yIqgH9v9WXdKKx/US+eWqk7Rj Z7wdYou/LtKZg== Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 06:06:49 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Shung-Hsi Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@nabladev.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, sr@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/314] 6.18.17-rc1 review Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 02:35:11PM +0800, Shung-Hsi Yu wrote: >Hi Sasha, > >On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 07:19:29AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.17 release. >> There are 314 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. > >BPF selftest is failing due to backported commit efc11a667878 ("bpf: >Improve bounds when tnum has a single possible value"). The fix is >commit 024cea2d647e ("selftests/bpf: Avoid simplification of crafted >bounds test"). Can you pick that up for both 6.18 and 6.19? Will do. >FWIW this failure does not point to actual issue of the codebase, just >that the selftest's expectation not aligning with the kernel. Great! -- Thanks, Sasha