From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Hyungjung Joo <jhj140711@gmail.com>
Cc: ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net, linux_oss@crudebyte.com,
m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: 9p: usbg: clear stale client pointer on close
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 15:01:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abT5tabfYV9a9RF_@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313171659.1225180-1-jhj140711@gmail.com>
Hyungjung Joo wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 02:16:59AM +0900:
> p9_usbg_close() tears down the client transport, but usb9pfs keeps
> using usb9pfs->client from asynchronous TX and RX completion handlers.
> A late completion can therefore dereference a client that has already
> been freed during mount teardown.
>
> Clear usb9pfs->client under usb9pfs->lock when closing the transport,
> detach any pending TX request from in_req->context, and make the TX/RX
> completion handlers bail out once the transport has been detached. This
> keeps late completions from touching a freed or rebound p9_client.
Just to make sure the problem is the usb9pfs struct being freed, not the
p9_client itself which is still alive after the usb device is gone
(until umount)?
I'm surprised free_func isn't called after unbind, which should stop the
queues (through disable_usb9pfs)?
or are the ep being disabled not enough to ensure the callbacks are not
in use? (e.g. disabling prevents further calls, but doesn't wait for
currently running/queued requests?)
(Also, thanks Michael for looking -- I'll let you do a first review
before looking deeper)
--
Dominique
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-14 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 17:16 [PATCH] net: 9p: usbg: clear stale client pointer on close Hyungjung Joo
2026-03-13 18:06 ` Michael Grzeschik
2026-03-14 6:01 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2026-03-14 7:24 ` Hyungjung Joo
2026-03-14 12:30 ` Dominique Martinet
2026-03-18 14:33 ` Michael Grzeschik
2026-03-18 14:49 ` Hyungjung Joo
2026-03-18 23:24 ` Michael Grzeschik
2026-03-19 0:30 ` Dominique Martinet
2026-03-19 9:16 ` Michael Grzeschik
2026-03-19 9:22 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abT5tabfYV9a9RF_@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jhj140711@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox