From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vineeth Karumanchi <vineeth.karumanchi@amd.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@amd.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: macb: Protect access to net_device::in_ptr with RCU lock
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:27:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abit7VLwoy2ttEus@pek-khao-d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DH4EHTJNY6GL.3EXTP61HNUNDD@bootlin.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2026 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 06:59:35PM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On Sun Mar 15, 2026 at 12:44 PM CET, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > @@ -5915,13 +5915,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused macb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >
> > if (bp->wol & MACB_WOL_ENABLED) {
> > /* Check for IP address in WOL ARP mode */
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > idev = __in_dev_get_rcu(bp->dev);
> > if (idev)
> > ifa = rcu_dereference(idev->ifa_list);
> > if ((bp->wolopts & WAKE_ARP) && !ifa) {
> > netdev_err(netdev, "IP address not assigned as required by WoL walk ARP\n");
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> > +
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->lock, flags);
> >
> > /* Disable Tx and Rx engines before disabling the queues,
> > @@ -5963,6 +5966,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused macb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > tmp |= MACB_BFEXT(IP, be32_to_cpu(ifa->ifa_local));
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bp->lock, flags);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > /* Change interrupt handler and
> > * Enable WoL IRQ on queue 0
>
> Instead of making the RCU critical section extend so much, you could
> dereference ifa->ifa_local into a stack variable. In particular, it
> would avoid the RCU critical section covering a spinlock critical
> section.
I initially considered using a local variable before submitting this, as I also
believe that `ifa->ifa_local` is unlikely to be modified or freed in this
context. However, I ultimately decided to protect these sections with RCU for
the following reasons:
- It is logically more consistent to protect access to `ifa->ifa_local` with
RCU locking.
- For section already under spinlock protection, adding RCU locking introduces
negligible overhead, especially in a scenario like this.
That said, I do not have a strong preference for either approach. If you prefer
using a local variable to keep the RCU region shorter, I can prepare a v2 with
that change.
Thanks,
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 11:44 [PATCH net 0/2] net: macb: Fix two lock warnings when WOL is used Kevin Hao
2026-03-15 11:44 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: macb: Move devm_{free,request}_irq() out of spin lock area Kevin Hao
2026-03-16 18:11 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-17 1:25 ` Kevin Hao
2026-03-17 16:01 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-15 11:44 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: macb: Protect access to net_device::in_ptr with RCU lock Kevin Hao
2026-03-16 17:59 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-17 1:27 ` Kevin Hao [this message]
2026-03-17 15:54 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-18 6:31 ` Kevin Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abit7VLwoy2ttEus@pek-khao-d3 \
--to=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=harini.katakam@amd.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=vineeth.karumanchi@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox