public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fix resource leaks on device setup failure
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:13:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acKb_jjoGBimP4CK@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <542cbea1-ed9f-4ba7-a906-7ec1e58c241c@sirena.org.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1753 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 01:23:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 11:30:42AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> 
> > Make sure to call controller cleanup() on late device setup failures to
> > avoid leaking resources allocated by setup().
> 
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> > @@ -4091,7 +4091,7 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> 
> This is specifically setup().  This is called repeatedly at runtime,
> it's not part of the device registration flow like the issues that were
> addressed by the commit you tagged as a fix.  Can you be more specific
> about the leak you're trying to fix here?

It's when spi_add_device() device fails in spi_setup() that cleanup()
may no longer be called.

	spi_add_device()
	  __spi_add_device()
	    spi_setup()
	      controller->setup()
	      return -<errno>;

And there are drivers that allocate memory in the controller->setup()
callback which is released in ->cleanup() (e.g. atmel_spi_setup() and
atmel_spi_cleanup()).

From a quick look at some of the drivers it did not seem limited to
memory allocations.

But I see now that not all of them can handle cleanup() being called
more than once, which could indeed happen if a later call to spi_setup()
fails after the device has been added.

We could set a flag to track whether setup() has ever been called
successfully, or make sure that cleanup() can be called more than once
for all drivers.

> > +err_cleanup:
> > +       if (spi->controller->cleanup)
> > +               spi->controller->cleanup(spi);
> 
> spi_cleanup()

I open-coded as I'm matching the call to ->setup() inside spi_setup()
with ->cleanup() (i.e. not spi_setup() with spi_cleanup()).

Johan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 265 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24 10:30 [PATCH] spi: fix resource leaks on device setup failure Johan Hovold
2026-03-24 13:23 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-24 14:13   ` Johan Hovold [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acKb_jjoGBimP4CK@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox